Uncategorized WHETHER HONG KONG IS PART OF CHINA By Mr Old Man Posted on March 1, 2013 5 min read 2 0 2,832 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Reddit Share on Pinterest Share on Linkedin Share on Tumblr Dear VCB TF members and all, Your best wishes sent to Mr. Old Man is one day earlier than Mr. Old Man’s birthday. Please treat this piece of news as my BIG THANK YOU to you Regarding the question whether B/L showing Hong Kong as the port of loading is acceptable if the L/C requires shipment to be effected from any port of China, I ever answered in DCPro Forum as follows: QUOTEDespite the fact that Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China and practising “One Country Two Systems” with high degree of autonomy, I do believe China will strongly protest if anyone says Hong Kong now does not belong to China. Hong Kong is part of China. So, if L/C requires shipment to be effected from any Chinese port, B/L showing on board at Hong Kong is acceptable.UNQUOTE The issue has been discussed by ICC BC whether the future ISBP will include the guidance that Hong Kong is acceptable as one of the Chinese ports. It is rumoured that ICC China has decided that in principle Hong Kong is not part of China. It means that if the L/C requires any port of China as the port of loading/discharge, then B/L showing Hong Kong as port of loading/discharge is not acceptable. Rumour is only rumour. In the last meeting of ICC BC in February 2013, ICC has concluded as follows: QUOTEANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONWhen a credit indicates that shipment is to be effected from "Any Chinese Port"(or to "Any Chinese Port"), it is recognised that in the context of examination of documents on their face, in accordance with UCP 600 sub-article 14 (a), this would include Hong Kong being shown as the port of loading (or port of discharge). However, applicants and beneficiaries should be aware that differing customs systems and regimes operate in Hong Kong and at ports in Mainland China. Therefore, a credit should specifically indicate where shipment is only to be effected from or to a port in Mainland China. This comment is particularly relevant to applicants who are based in Mainland China that may require, or at the very least expect, delivery to occur at a port in Mainland China as opposed to Hong Kong. Otherwise, banks will be required to honour or negotiate documents that indicate shipment from or to Hong Kong, even though the expectation under the contract and the credit may have been for the use of a port of loading (or discharge) in Mainland China.UNQUOTE The above is quoted ICC Document 470/1214 20 Feb, 2013. Once again thank you for your best wishes on Mr. Old Man’s special day. Please treat this piece of news as my BIG THANK YOU to you With warmest regards,Mr. Old Man
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?