Home Uncategorized SHORT FORM/BLANK BACK BILL OF LADING

SHORT FORM/BLANK BACK BILL OF LADING

2 min read
3
0
2,391


QUERY
________________________________________
From: Ngoc Duong Minh (TTTM-HO) []Sent: Wed 10/6/2010 2:48 PM
To: Nguyen Huu Duc (DNG)
Subject: FOR YOUR OPINION

Dear Mr Old Man,

Tks so much for your kind support during the time,
I am now facing difficult case, once more time, I would like to seek your comment on this situation:

BLANK BACK B/L

Pls find attached file for your information. Pls be noted that, the B/L not including terms and condition of carriage on its back and on the face of the B/L, we see the phase that “IN ACCEPTING THIS B/L, THE SHIPPER, CONSIGNEE, HOLDER, HEREOF AND THE OWNER OF THE GOODS AGREE, THE SAME AS IF SIGNED BY EACH OF THEM, THAT THE RECEIPT, CUSTODY, CARRIAGE, RELAY, DELIVERY AND ANY TRANSHIPPING OF THE GOODS ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS APPEARING ON THE FACE AND BACK HEREOF…”. Whether or not may we consider this b/l make reference to another sourse containing the terms and conditions of carriage base on this phrase?

Hope to receive your opinion soon.

Thanks and best regards
Duong Minh Ngoc (Ms.)
Executive Senior Officer
Trade Processing
———————————————-

COMMENT

________________________________________
From: Nguyen Huu Duc (DNG)
Sent: Wed 10/6/2010 4:57 PM
To: Ngoc Duong Minh (TTTM-HO)
Subject: RE: FOR YOUR OPINION

Dear Ngoc,

The UCP provides for short form/blank back bills of lading on the basis that the B/L refers to another source document with regard to the terms and conditions of carriage. I do not see there is such reference, hence, I’ll reject it.

Best regards,
Mr. Old Man

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Uncategorized

3 Comments

  1. anonymous

    October 21, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    zost writes:I have no image of this B/L, so I must rely on the B/L statement as quoted earlier. The statement includes "In accepting this B/L the parties (named in statement)agree … that … the carriage … is … subject to the terms appearing on the face and back hereof …"So I must conclude that there is in fact a clear statement that B/L does contain terms and conditions of carriage. So we have to solve 2 questions: 1) whether terms and conditions of carriage may be blank/emty in a B/L and 2) Is the answer to question 1) of any importance if, as per UCP600, "Content of terms and conditions of carriage will not be examined." In my opinion, if I have to reject (not to pay) that B/L I should include some explanation like "Bill of Lading is apparently fake as it does not contain any real terms and conditions of carriage despite the affirmative statement on it".

    Reply

  2. anonymous

    October 21, 2010 at 9:10 pm

    Lucky writes:cho cháu hỏi có trường hợp như vầy:Hợp đồng ký 10/9/2010.quy định thanh toán = L/C do ngân hàng Vichovia mở.Ngày giao hàng chậm nhất là 20/10/2010.L/C mở muộn nhất trước ngày giao hàng.Người thụ hưởng ở VN nhận được L/C có ghi 10/10/2010.Nếu là người thụ hưởng Chú sẽ xử lý như thế nào?giải đáp hộ cháu nhé,cảm ơn chú ! Thân chào .

    Reply

  3. mroldmanvcb

    October 22, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    Binhf thuwowngf. Neeus nguwowif thuj huwowngr khoong theer tuaan thur ddieeuf kieenj cuar LC cos theer yeeu caauf applicant suwar ddooir.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

LẠI TRỞ LẠI CAO TỐC LA SƠN

Đã hàng chục lần trở lại cung đường này vào những thời điểm khác nhau khi thì một mình khi…