Q&A Uncategorized SHIPPED ON BOARD By Mr Old Man Posted on April 23, 2016 2 min read 2 0 3,672 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Reddit Share on Pinterest Share on Linkedin Share on Tumblr QUESTION Dear Sir, 1. In LC nothing mentioned about place of receipt and place of discharge but BL shows as below. Place of receipt: Antwerp Port of Loading: Antwerp Port of Discharge: Jebel Ali Place of delivery: Jebel Ali 2. BL has the clause ‘RECEIVED FOR SHIPMENT IN APPARENT GOOD ORDER AND CONDITION’ and Shipped on board date as 15-04-2016. However, there is no notation of “Shipped on board” Can this be considered as Shipped on board BL? Palani ——– ANSWER Hi, It is agreed that: (1) For a bill of lading pre-printed “shipped on board” with or without place of receipt and NO indication of a means of pre-carriage, no on board notation is needed and the date of issue is considered to be the date of shipment. (2) For a bill of lading pre-printed “received for shipment” with or without place of receipt and NO indication of a means of pre-carriage, a dated on board notation is required. The bill of lading in question is a “received for shipment” bill of lading, so a dated on board notation is required. However, as described, the bill of lading has no on board notation but the wording “Shipped on board date as 15 – 04 -2016”. In my opinion the bill of lading is acceptable. I would treat the wording “Shipped on board date as 15 – 04 -2016” as a dated on board notation. Kind regards, Mr. Old Man
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?