Home Mr Old Man On Approval Basis – When the Decision Is Left to the Issuing Bank

On Approval Basis – When the Decision Is Left to the Issuing Bank

3 min read
1
0
35

In day-to-day LC work, not every presentation arrives with confidence and clean lines. Sometimes, the nominated bank steps back a little and sends the documents forward “on approval basis”—a small phrase, but one that shifts the practical dynamics quite a bit. What exactly does it mean, and how should the issuing bank respond?

Question

Dear Mr. Old Man,

Hope you are keeping well.

We as issuing bank have received documents under a letter of credit on “approval basis” by the nominated bank.

Please help me understand:

  • What does “on approval basis” mean in an LC context?
  • What practical steps should the issuing bank take?

Your prompt guidance is highly appreciated.

Best regards,

Ziyad

_______

Answer

Dear Ziyad,

“On approval basis” is not a term in UCP 600. It is only a banking expression.

It means the nominated bank does not pay or negotiate the documents. The documents are sent to the issuing bank for its decision, and the nominated bank will act only upon the issuing bank’s approval.

In many cases, the documents have discrepancies. But not always. Sometimes the bank is just being cautious.

For the issuing bank, the steps are:

  1. Examine the documents
    Check the documents based on the LC terms and UCP 600. Do not rely only on the nominated bank’s statement of discrepancies.
  2. Make your own decision
  • If documents comply, you must honour.
  • If documents do not comply, you may refuse under Article 16 of UCP 600.
  1. If you ask the applicant for approval

List all discrepancies. Include both:

  • discrepancies from the nominated bank
  • discrepancies found by your bank
  1. If you refuse

Follow Article 16 strictly (time, notice, discrepancies).

In short:

“On approval basis” does not change your responsibility. You must still examine and decide.

Best regards,
Mr. Old Man

 

One Comment

  1. Pieter Muus

    May 7, 2026 at 5:44 pm

    Dear Mr. Old Man, please allow me to seek your guidance in the matter of nomination.
    As I see it , nomination has two effects: Firstly, it determines the place where the credit is available, i.e. where presentation is to be made. Secondly it authorises the Nominated bank to honour or negotiate Art.12 does not impose any obligation on the NB to do either of above.

    In case NB does not examine the documents, and only forwards them to the issuing bank on approval basis :
    – Can it be said that presentaion was made at NB ? Or will presentation date be when IB receives the documents ?
    – When documents are lost in transit between NB and IB , would Art.35 still be applicable?

    Thank you for wisdom

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Mr Old Man

Check Also

Bill of Lading vs Air Transport Document: Why Does UCP 600 Treat the Issuance Date Differently?

A small wording difference between article 20 and article 23 of UCP 600 often raises an in…