When ISBP Default Rules Meet an Express LC Requirement One of the most common misunderstandings in document checking arises from relying on ISBP default provisions while overlooking what the credit itself expressly requires. A typical example is the commercial invoice: ISBP tells us when an invoice need not be signed — but what happens when the LC explicitly calls for …

INTRODUCTION Questions about whether a confirming bank is also a nominated bank may sound academic at first glance, but in practice they can become critically important — especially when a credit involves more than one confirming bank, a specific place of expiry, and documents moving across several borders. This Q&A examines a real-life scenario involving two confirming banks and explores …

Clarifying Quantity Requirements When an LC Covers Multiple Lots In practice, letters of credit covering multiple lots of goods often give rise to misunderstandings about whether each lot may be shipped separately — and how the limit on the number of shipments should be interpreted.  On this occasion, let’s take a look at an interesting scenario raised by our colleague …

INTRODUCTION With Technical Advisor Opinion TA.958 now on the table—specifically the question of whether a bill of lading showing both “freight prepaid” and “freight payable at D” should be considered conflicting under a credit that explicitly requires the document to be marked “freight prepaid”—the trade finance community is once again paying close attention. As we all know, the ICC Banking …

Intro In practice, banks and beneficiaries often face uncertainty when a credit requires a CIF or CIP term but does not state how freight or insurance should be shown. Must the invoice break them down? What if the actual freight or insurance charges are unknown at the time of issuing documents? Mr. Old Man shares some guidance based on ISBP …

Introduction In export financing, the terms with recourse and without recourse often cause confusion, especially when applied to negotiation under LCs or discounting of drafts under collections. Although both methods provide early funding to exporters, the underlying risk allocation—and therefore the pricing and discounting ratios—are very different.  Below is Mr. Old Man’s explanation to a reader who asked why banks …

A Practical Q&A with Mr. Old Man In documentary credit work, applicants, consignees, and importers often end up being the same party, yet the terminology on document templates is rarely consistent. A common question is: If the LC asks for the “Applicant,” but the COO form only provides space for the “Consignee,” will banks treat that as a discrepancy? Let’s …

Introduction Sanctions clauses continue to create operational challenges in documentary credit practice, especially when multiple banks apply different compliance standards. A common problem arises when the confirming bank adds its own sanctions requirement, even though the issuing bank has already inserted a sanctions clause in the LC.  In this Q&A, we look at a real case involving an LC issued …

In today’s LC practice, two issues appear repeatedly and often cause confusion for both exporters and bankers. The first is whether an invoice under CIF or CFR must show a cost breakdown, especially the insurance premium. Many presentations include partial breakdowns—or even show freight as zero—raising the question of whether such invoices are compliant when the LC itself is silent. …

Intro: A practitioner raised a practical question regarding the appropriate method for computing issuance commission on a cumulative revolving LC, especially when the bank’s exposure changes over time. Below is the refined question and Mr. Old Man’s response. Question  Dear Mr. Old Man, I would appreciate your guidance on the following: We have a cumulative revolving LC issued for USD …