In documentary credit practice, banks sometimes raise discrepancies based on expectations that are not expressly required under UCP 600 or ISBP 821. Two common issues are the numbering of original bills of lading and the indication of total weight. A reader recently asked: ✅ Question Dear Mr. Old Man, A credit requires presentation of 3/3 original bills of lading plus …

In day-to-day LC work, not every presentation arrives with confidence and clean lines. Sometimes, the nominated bank steps back a little and sends the documents forward “on approval basis”—a small phrase, but one that shifts the practical dynamics quite a bit. What exactly does it mean, and how should the issuing bank respond? Question Dear Mr. Old Man, Hope you …

Intro Questions around “notify party” often look harmless at first glance—until a small detail turns into a discrepancy. This case is a good reminder that while practice allows some flexibility, the credit’s requirements still draw the line. Question Dear Mr. Old Man, Hope you are doing well. Sorry for troubling you with my queries. This one is with reference to …

Introduction In documentary collections under URC 522, things often run on familiar rails—documents sent, acceptance obtained, maturity awaited. Most of the time, the collecting bank’s role remains strictly mechanical. Then, occasionally, a small question appears: “With or without avalization?” It sounds like a minor procedural choice. In reality, it quietly shifts the nature of the transaction—from relying solely on the …

Discussions around the possible revision of UCP 600 often bring out interesting practical concerns. One of them, raised recently by a colleague, goes straight to the heart of risk allocation in documentary credits: If a nominated bank prepays or discounts under a credit, and fraud is discovered later, who ultimately bears the risk? A fair question — and not an …

As discussions continue around whether UCP 600 should be revised, some suggestions focus not on rewriting the rules entirely, but on simplifying specific provisions. One such suggestion is to remove availability by acceptance under Article 6(b), on the basis that drafts are no longer necessary in modern practice. At first glance, this seems reasonable. But as often in trade finance, …

Người làm nghề tín dụng chứng từ vốn đã quen với một “chu kỳ ngầm”: cứ khoảng 10 năm, lại có một phiên bản UCP mới ra đời. Từ những ngày đầu cho đến UCP 600, các lần sửa đổi thường diễn ra theo một nhịp khá đều. Nhưng lần này thì khác. Đã gần 20 năm trôi qua — …

For those working in documentary credits, there has always been an unspoken rhythm: roughly every decade, a new version of UCP comes along. From its early days to UCP 600, revisions have followed a fairly regular cycle. But this time feels different. Nearly 20 years have passed — and UCP 600 remains untouched. No draft revision. No clear signal of …

This article is inspired by “Documentary credits and the illusion of certainty – resolving the real problem” by David Meynell. □ We tend to think of letters of credit as a “safe” method of payment. As long as documents comply with the terms of the credit and UCP 600, payment should follow. Banks examine documents, not goods. They do not …

Bài này được viết lại lấy cảm hứng từ bài viết “Documentary credits and the illusion of certainty – resolving the real problem” của Dave Meynell – chuyên gia ICC. Ai muốn đọc bản gốc tiếng Anh thì xem ở đây: https://www.tradefinance.training/blog/articles/documentary-credits-and-the-illusion-of-certainty–resolving-the-real-problem/ Còn muốn dễ tiêu hóa thì đọc bản tiếng Việt này nhé. Tín dụng chứng từ: Tưởng chắc …