Home Mr Old Man MUST ALL ORIGINALS BE PRESENTED?

MUST ALL ORIGINALS BE PRESENTED?

3 min read
3
0
832

QUESTION

Dear Sir

I have come across a case which needs your attention and expertise to solve this issue.

Case:

A credit requires a phytosanitary certificate without mentioning the number to be issued.

Documents were presented along with an original and two copies of phytosanitary certificate. Therefore, issuing bank refused the document quoting the following discrepancy:

“Phytosanitary certificate evidence that three originals were issued therefore three original certificates must be presented as per sub article 17(e)”.

So, my question is issuing bank right at their refusal?

Thanks & Regards,

Arif Md. Juwel

——

ANSWER

Hi,

I must say that the discrepancy raised by the issuing bank is invalid. The provision that the number of originals stated on the document is to be presented only applies to transport documents and insurance documents, and not to other documents. Please refer to ISBP 821 para. A29 (b), which says, “When a transport document or insurance document indicates how many originals have been issued, the number of originals stated on the document is to be presented, except as stated in paragraphs H12) and J7) (c)”.

Where the LC requires a phytosanitary certificate without mentioning the number of originals to be presented, one original phytosanitary certificate presented is acceptable even when the document indicates in itself that more than one original has been issued. Please refer to an example in ISBP 821 para. A29 (d) (i), which says, “When a credit requires, for example, presentation of “Invoice”, “One Invoice”, “Invoice in 1 copy” or “Invoice – 1 copy”, it will be understood to be a requirement for an original invoice”.

Hopefully the answer is helpful.

Best regards,

Mr. Old Man

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Mr Old Man

3 Comments

  1. Faisal Zaheer

    May 29, 2024 at 8:07 pm

    Dear Old Man, Please guide

    Scenario:

    -LC issued MT-700 by MCBLMUMUXXX MAURITIUS
    -LC received and transmitted by BOMLAEADFTC UAE to BAFL-India MT-710
    -LC requested and confirmed by BOMLAEADFTC UAE
    -all charges outside ( ALL LOCAL AND FOREIGN WHETHER WITHIN OR OUTSIDE IS ACCOUNT OF APPLICANT)
    -available by BOMLAEADFTC UAE Payment
    -1st confirming bank BOMLAEADFTC UAE
    -2nd confirmation by BAFL-India on request of beneficiary.

    remittance cover was made and sent to BOMLAEADFTC UAE claiming bill amount + confirmation charges.
    however payment received from BOMLAEADFTC UAE only bill amount .

    my question in this scenario who will pay 2nd confirmation charges applicant or beneficiary ?

    Warm Regrads
    Faisal Zaheer

    Reply

    • Mr Old Man

      May 30, 2024 at 10:05 pm

      Hi,

      What I understand from your description is that BAFL India added its confirmation to the LC at the request of the beneficiary, and not at the request of the issuing bank.

      The beneficiary will pay the 2nd confirmation fee to BAFL India. The applicant will pay other charges including the confirmation fee payable to BOMLAEADFTC UAE.

      Best regards,
      Mr. Old Man

      Reply

  2. Faisal Zaheer

    May 31, 2024 at 12:20 pm

    Hi Mr. old man. can we call 2nd confirmation as silent confirmation or not?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

INVOICE NOT CERTIFYING WHAT HAS NOT BEEN SHIPPED

QUESTION Dear Sir, LC allows both AIR and SEA shipment. Amount: USD 100,000 Shipment by AI…