May 04, 2026
  • Contact

Mr. Old Man For those who eat, sleep and breathe Letters of Credit & Cycling

  • Home
  • Articles

    Rảnh… mà không rảnh

    Mê xem web drama Tàu

    Hai mươi năm… một quả bóng, một bãi biển, một ông già chưa chịu già

    Ngân hàng ngoại và câu chuyện khách hàng “đi theo quốc tịch”

    Ngân hàng đổ bộ vào VIFC… Ăn cỗ đi trước?

  • Lifestyle

    Rảnh… mà không rảnh

    Mê xem web drama Tàu

    Hai mươi năm… một quả bóng, một bãi biển, một ông già chưa chịu già

    Ngân hàng ngoại và câu chuyện khách hàng “đi theo quốc tịch”

    Ngân hàng đổ bộ vào VIFC… Ăn cỗ đi trước?

  • Discovery on the cycling road

    Tam Kỳ – từ “kì lắm” đến kì diệu?

    Trả lại sông Hàn: không chỉ là chuyện bờ kè

    Chuyện chữ nghĩa… và một câu hỏi trớt quớt

    Cứ đạp chiếc 3 Sixty ra đường… kiểu gì cũng có chuyện vui để kể.

    When Memory Starts to “Lose Its Way”

  • Q&A
  • Popular
3 New Articles
  • 7 hours ago Same Bank or Different Bank? A Practical UCP 600 Puzzle on Branches and Presentation
  • 7 hours ago Rảnh… mà không rảnh
  • 7 hours ago When Documents Fail: Discrepancy and Possible Fraud
Home Mr Old Man Q&A (page 22)

Q&A

Nhân viên TTQT/TTTM trước làn sóng AI – Chuyển hướng hay bị đào thải?

By Mr Old Man
July 23, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Q&A
0
116

Khi AI bắt đầu tràn vào ngân hàng, tự động hoá từ khâu nhập LC tới kiểm tra chứng từ, nhiều người làm Thanh toán quốc tế và Tài trợ thương mại đang thấp thỏm lo âu: Liệu mình có còn đất sống? Một câu hỏi đầy tâm tư từ bạn Hà – người từng là “dân TTQT chính hiệu” …

Read More

Missing Signature on Air Waybill — Is It a Discrepancy? Let’s Ask UCP 600 Article 23

By Mr Old Man
July 23, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
339

When it comes to checking transport documents under a letter of credit, sometimes the devil is in the signature box. A common situation arises where the same company acts both as agent for the shipper and the carrier — but only signs in one spot. Does that fly under UCP 600 rules? Or is it grounds for a discrepancy? Let’s …

Read More

Nominated But Not Obligated: What UCP 600 Really Expects from Nominated Banks

By Mr Old Man
July 22, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
180

In the world of Letters of Credit, being nominated doesn’t always mean being obligated. This subtle—but crucial—distinction lies at the heart of how UCP 600 treats the role of the nominated bank. A recent question raised by ICC-certified expert Domenico Del Sorbo highlights this exact nuance: Why doesn’t UCP 600 impose an obligation on a nominated bank—not acting on its …

Read More

Typed vs. Pre-printed: Where Are Insurance Claims Really Payable?

By Mr Old Man
July 21, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
110

In today’s question, we dive into one of those subtle yet surprisingly common document issues — when an insurance certificate contains both a typed clause and pre-printed text about where claims are payable… and they don’t quite say the same thing. Our reader Rohini brings up a case where the LC requires claims to be payable in China, and the …

Read More

DO THE CUSTOMER A FAVOUR?

By Mr Old Man
July 20, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
90

In the world of letters of credit, not every favour is straightforward — especially when the clock has run out. One reader recently wrote in with a dilemma that many banks have quietly faced: Should we “help” a customer by withholding a discrepancy, even when the presentation is clearly late? It’s a question of both procedure and principle. Let’s take …

Read More

Why LCs require 1/3 of Original B/L Sent Directly to the Applicant?

By Mr Old Man
July 20, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Q&A
0
610

Here’s a classic case where trade logistics outpace banking procedures. A reader recently flagged an unusual LC condition: the requirement to courier part of the original bill of lading set — negotiable, no less — directly to the issuing bank within three working days of shipment. Why the rush? And what’s the logic behind splitting up the B/L set this …

Read More

Who bears the Risk? When the Applicant Rejects Discrepant Documents After Reimbursement

By Mr Old Man
July 18, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
190

Our friend TF recently shared an interesting case involving an Iraqi bank, a Jordanian issuing bank, and a confirming bank in the USA. The question raised: What happens if the applicant bank finds valid discrepancies after the confirming bank has already been reimbursed? Here’s how I answered — right after a strong espresso and a quick ride on my trade …

Read More

DOUBLE CONFIRMATION: IS IT POSSIBLE?

By Mr Old Man
July 16, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
297

Today, Facebook reminded me of a fascinating discussion that took place 16 years ago — on 27 June 2009 — on the now-defunct DCPro forum. It revolved around a rather rare scenario: a letter of credit confirmed by two separate confirming banks. The original question came from Khalid (UAE), and the conversation included insightful responses from renowned trade finance experts …

Read More

LC vs Contract: What Happens When Goods Fail but Documents Pass?

By Mr Old Man
July 15, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
234

When the contract collapses but the credit stands firm — Mr. Old Man untangles the rules, rights, and realities behind this classic trade finance dilemma. QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, I came to know you through the praise and recommendation of my university lecturer. And when I encountered difficulties, the first person I thought of was not ChatGPT, but your …

Read More

Place of Presentation: Not All Roads lead to Rome

By Mr Old Man
July 14, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
197

QUESTION Hi Mr. Old Man, I often see the place of presentation stated as the beneficiary’s country or city. But in some LCs, can the place of presentation be fixed as the importer’s city — for example, when the LC is available with the issuing bank? Thanks and regards, Hemant _____________ ANSWER Hi Hemant, It depends on the type of …

Read More
1...212223...66Page 22 of 66

About me

Recent Posts

Same Bank or Different Bank? A Practical UCP 600 Puzzle on Branches and Presentation

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

Rảnh… mà không rảnh

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

When Documents Fail: Discrepancy and Possible Fraud

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

Mê xem web drama Tàu

Mr Old Man
1 day ago
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • Tags

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

FIELD 72 (SENDER TO RECEIVER INFORMATION) OF MT 103

Mr Old Man
March 8, 2010

TRANSFERRING BANK S LIABILITY UNDER TRANSFERRED LC

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Same Bank or Different Bank? A Practical UCP 600 Puzzle on Branches and Presentation

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

Rảnh… mà không rảnh

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

When Documents Fail: Discrepancy and Possible Fraud

Mr Old Man
7 hours ago

Mê xem web drama Tàu

Mr Old Man
1 day ago

Đặng Văn: Tôi ủng hộ ý kiến rất hay của bạn ! Bản thân tôi cũng đã đạp xe đi làm ( và đi c...

Pieter Muus: Dear Mr. Old Man, With all respect due, please allow me to state that you quote...

Mr Old Man: Thank you for reminding me of ISBP 821 paragraph B14. As far as I recall, earlie...

Pieter Muus: Interesting . Apparently, this happens a lot in drafts/bills of exchange, since...

Facebook Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 negotiation Insurance Documents lost in transit Amendment On board notation DRAFTS fraud SBLC notify party confirmation Chat GPT Mr Old Man Late presentation Surrendered bill of lading lc-expired Revolving LC Insurance document invoice Tà Lang non-documentary conditions CPBL short shipment Chợ Nồi Rang

Follow Me

Popular posts

PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B)

Mr Old Man
October 19, 2015

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

WHETHER MT999 IS AN AUTHENTICATED SWIFT MESSAGE

Mr Old Man
July 31, 2018

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Travel

EARLY PRESENTATION

Mr Old Man
September 11, 2017

QUESTION Dear Mr Old Man, I am Dang from Vietnam Prosperity bank. I know …

Timeline

  • September 6, 2023

    WHETHER THE MASTER LC SHOULD BE CONFIRMED

  • November 4, 2024

    LATE PRESENTATION OR NOT? (updated)

  • January 17, 2026

    WHEN WORDS AND FIGURES DON’T AGREE: Is It a Discrepancy under UCP 600?

  • March 12, 2020

    ĐÀ NẴNG ĐỪNG ĐÁNH MẤT BÃI ĐÁ TRIỆU NĂM MỘT LẦN NỮA

  • April 1, 2011

    AN EXAMPLE OF A TRANSFERABLE LETTER OF CREDIT TRANSACTION

  • April 4, 2013

    WHETHER THE NAME OF THE MASTER, THE OWNER OR THE CHARTERER MUST BE STATED ON THE CPBL

Top Tags SBLC notify party Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 confirmation Late presentation negotiation Amendment fraud DRAFTS Documents lost in transit Facebook Insurance Mr Old Man On board notation Chat GPT
© Copyright 2014 - 2017 | Mr Old Man Theme by ThietKeWebDaNang.Com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Cuongnq