February 02, 2026
  • Contact

Mr. Old Man For those who eat, sleep and breathe Letters of Credit & Cycling

  • Home
  • Articles

    My superstition… just leveled up

    Trình mê tín của Mr. Old Man… vừa lên một cấp

    Playing Facebook like this… I must be a little crazy

    Chơi Facebook kiểu này… chắc cũng hơi “khùng” thiệt

     My Superstition “Saved” Alcaraz from Zverev (!?)

  • Lifestyle

    My superstition… just leveled up

    Trình mê tín của Mr. Old Man… vừa lên một cấp

    Playing Facebook like this… I must be a little crazy

    Chơi Facebook kiểu này… chắc cũng hơi “khùng” thiệt

     My Superstition “Saved” Alcaraz from Zverev (!?)

  • Discovery on the cycling road

    Everyone Has Once Been…

    WHEN BEAUTIFUL LADIES RIDE BIKES

    KHI NHỮNG NGƯỜI ĐẸP CHƠI XE ĐẠP

    Ai rồi cũng từng là…

    MONKEY MOUNTAIN CHALLENGE 2025 TRẦN MAI – THE NEW QUEEN OF MONKEY MOUNTAIN

  • Q&A
  • Popular
3 New Articles
  • 10 hours ago My superstition… just leveled up
  • 10 hours ago Trình mê tín của Mr. Old Man… vừa lên một cấp
  • 12 hours ago Playing Facebook like this… I must be a little crazy
Home Mr Old Man Q&A (page 2)

Q&A

When an LC Makes Payment Subject to Buyer–Seller Disputes

By Mr Old Man
3 weeks ago
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
32

Intro One of the core principles of a documentary credit is that payment depends solely on complying documents, not on disputes arising from the underlying commercial contract. From time to time, however, beneficiaries encounter LCs that attempt to dilute this principle by inserting clauses linking payment to buyer–seller disputes. The following Q&A addresses such a case and explains why these …

Read More

Drafts under Letters of Credit: Common Confusions and Practical Answers

By Mr Old Man
3 weeks ago
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
81

Intro Drafts (bills of exchange) are among the most misunderstood elements in documentary credit practice. Although UCP 600 and ISBP 821 provide guidance, inconsistent LC drafting and legacy habits continue to cause confusion—especially when drafts are mentioned in some fields of the LC but not listed as required documents. In the Q&A below, Mr. Old Man responds to a set …

Read More

MUST COURIER RECEIPT INDICATE CONTRACT NUMBER AND DATE?

By Mr Old Man
4 weeks ago
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
33

  Intro In LC practice, refusals often arise not because a document is missing, but because banks read documentary requirements in isolation rather than in context. One recurring issue is whether supporting evidence attached to a required document must independently comply with a general condition such as “all documents must show contract number and date”. The following Q&A illustrates why …

Read More

BRANCHES OF A BANK IN THE SAME COUNTRY

By Mr Old Man
4 weeks ago
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
57

Intro There have been cases where an issuing bank refused to honour a credit on the grounds that the beneficiary presented the documents at a branch other than the branch expressly nominated in the LC, even though both branches belong to the same bank and are located in the same country. In such cases, the beneficiary is unable to re-present …

Read More

When an Invoice Exceeds the LC Amount: Understanding UCP 600 Sub-Article 18(b)

By Mr Old Man
January 2, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
74

Intro In LC practice, commercial invoices are often treated as rigid documents that must strictly mirror the credit amount. However, UCP 600 allows for a degree of flexibility — provided banks understand where discretion ends and obligation begins. One such provision is UCP 600 sub-article 18(b), which deals with invoices issued for amounts exceeding the LC value. The following Q&A …

Read More

Split Payments Under an LC: 80% of Invoice Amount or 80% of LC Amount?

By Mr Old Man
December 29, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
57

Intro Credits that split payment between shipment and installation often cause confusion when partial shipments are involved. The key question is whether payment should be linked to a percentage of the invoice or a percentage of the LC amount. Question Dear Mr. Old Man, We have an LC for USD 10,000, available by payment. The LC provides: * 80% payable …

Read More

Insurance Endorsement under an LC: “Endorsed to Bank” or “To the Order of Bank”?

By Mr Old Man
December 27, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
64

Intro Insurace documents under letters of credit often create confusion—especially when beneficiaries apply bill of lading concepts to insurance policies or certificates. One recurring grey area is whether an insurance document should be endorsed “to” a named bank or “to the order of” that bank, particularly when the credit expressly requires the document to be transferable. The following Q&A addresses …

Read More

DDP, Insurance Documents, and Unloading Risk: Getting Incoterms® Right in an LC Context

By Mr Old Man
December 26, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
39

Intro  One of the recurring sources of confusion in trade finance arises when Incoterms® are mechanically copied into a letter of credit without considering what those rules actually require — or do not require.  A typical example is an LC issued on DDP terms that nevertheless calls for the presentation of an insurance policy or certificate. Is that correct? And …

Read More

Can a Confirming Bank Refuse When Documents Arrive After Expiry?

By Mr Old Man
December 25, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
55

Intro In practice, documents are often presented to a nominated bank close to the LC expiry date and then forwarded onward to a confirming bank. This raises a recurring question: does the confirming bank have the right to refuse simply because the documents reach its counter after expiry?  The following scenario illustrates why forwarding time must not be confused with …

Read More

On Board Date Format on a Bill of Lading: Is “25.12.24” a Discrepancy?

By Mr Old Man
December 25, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
39

Intro One of the most common — and often unnecessary — discrepancies raised in document examination relates to the format of dates shown on transport documents. Examiners sometimes hesitate when a date is expressed numerically rather than with the month stated in words. But does such hesitation have any basis under ISBP 821? Let’s look at a straightforward example. __________ …

Read More
123...61Page 2 of 61

About me

Recent Posts

My superstition… just leveled up

Mr Old Man
10 hours ago

Trình mê tín của Mr. Old Man… vừa lên một cấp

Mr Old Man
10 hours ago

Playing Facebook like this… I must be a little crazy

Mr Old Man
12 hours ago

Chơi Facebook kiểu này… chắc cũng hơi “khùng” thiệt

Mr Old Man
1 day ago
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • Tags

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

FIELD 72 (SENDER TO RECEIVER INFORMATION) OF MT 103

Mr Old Man
March 8, 2010

TRANSFERRING BANK S LIABILITY UNDER TRANSFERRED LC

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

My superstition… just leveled up

Mr Old Man
10 hours ago

Trình mê tín của Mr. Old Man… vừa lên một cấp

Mr Old Man
10 hours ago

Playing Facebook like this… I must be a little crazy

Mr Old Man
12 hours ago

Chơi Facebook kiểu này… chắc cũng hơi “khùng” thiệt

Mr Old Man
1 day ago

Mr Old Man: Thank you for reminding me of ISBP 821 paragraph B14. As far as I recall, earlie...

Pieter Muus: Interesting . Apparently, this happens a lot in drafts/bills of exchange, since...

Rupnarayan Bose: LC asking for applicant's name and address from the carrier or its agent is impr...

Mr Old Man: Your comments are always welcome...

Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 Facebook negotiation Documents lost in transit Insurance On board notation Amendment Chat GPT DRAFTS Late presentation lc-expired Revolving LC invoice non-documentary conditions CPBL confirmation Retirement Alcaraz SBLC Court Injunction Surrendered bill of lading any chinese port beneficiarys-name expiry-date branches-of-a-bank

Follow Me

Popular posts

PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B)

Mr Old Man
October 19, 2015

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

WHETHER MT999 IS AN AUTHENTICATED SWIFT MESSAGE

Mr Old Man
July 31, 2018

LC CONFIRMED BY THE FIRST ADVISING BANK

Mr Old Man
September 15, 2013

Travel

EARLY PRESENTATION

Mr Old Man
September 11, 2017

QUESTION Dear Mr Old Man, I am Dang from Vietnam Prosperity bank. I know …

Timeline

  • July 15, 2011

    WHERE 1/3 ORIGINAL BILL OF LADING IS TO BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE ISSUING BANK

  • March 24, 2012

    CLAIMING REIMBURSEMENT WITHOUT NEGOTIATION

  • March 15, 2025

    RETURN OF DOCUMENTS (rev)

  • February 12, 2021

    CASE STUDY GIAO THỪA – MÓN QUÀ ĐẦU NĂM

  • March 5, 2010

    DRAFTS

  • February 19, 2025

    CAN THE ISSUING BANK REFUSE TO HONOUR THE CONFIRMING BANK IF IT FINDS THAT THE DOCUMENTS PRESENTED CONTAIN DISCREPANCIES?

Top Tags lc-expired Revolving LC Chat GPT invoice SBLC Amendment DRAFTS Facebook non-documentary conditions Late presentation negotiation Documents lost in transit Insurance Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 On board notation
© Copyright 2014 - 2017 | Mr Old Man Theme by ThietKeWebDaNang.Com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Cuongnq