FRAUDULENT FUND TRANSFER VIA EMAIL HACKING AND BENEFICIARY ACCOUNT CHANGE Two nights ago, just before midnight, a friend of mine—an in-house lawyer at a Korean bank (let’s call it Bank K)—sent me an email asking if I could recommend a Vietnamese lawyer to assist one of his clients. The client had fallen victim to a scam involving a fund transfer to a beneficiary account at a Vietnamese bank (let’s call … Read More
Can a Bill of Lading Show a Third Party as Shipper When the Credit Doesn’t mention it? QUESTION Dear Sir, Greetings from Himalayan Bank!!! I am here to ask for your valuable suggestion on below. Bill of Lading mentions Shipper as Third party acting on behalf of the Beneficiary but there is no provision for third party in the credit. Does this mean the third party is an authorized agent acting for the beneficiary? Can this be … Read More
Is “Bangkok Thailand” Without “PAT” Still Compliant With the LC? QUESTION Hi Sir, Request your opinion on the below. LC F 44B: BANGKOK THAILAND PAT BL place of Delivery: Bangkok Thailand. We have received a refusal from the issuing bank stating Place of Delivery in BL not as per LC. Please advise if this is a valid refusal and whether this can be refuted. Regards, PSP ___ ANSWER Hi, Field … Read More
AVOIDING DOCUMENT CHECKING TO CUT COSTS – IS IT A SMART MOVE? Mr. Old Man’s Note: For exporters using Letters of Credit (L/Cs), document checking fees are a recurring cost—and often a point of frustration. What happens when your own bank says your documents are complying, but the issuing bank still finds discrepancies? In this piece, I share a real question from an exporter and a practical response from yours truly. Sometimes … Read More
Address Updates in Export Documents Following Administrative Reorganization QUESTION Dear Sir, Good day and hope you’re doing well! Today marks a rather special occasion as our country prepares to enter a new phase with significant changes ahead. On this occasion, I have an interesting question that I hope you could kindly take some time to help clarify. According to Resolution No. 1682/NQ-UBTVQH15 regarding the reorganization of administrative units, … Read More
CLARIFICATION ON CRM DOCUMENT EXAMINATION STANDARDS QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, Thank you so much for your swift response — your explanation has clarified the previous issue for us. We are now facing another matter and would greatly appreciate your guidance: As the Confirming Bank, we received a set of documents that appear to be compliant, including a CMR document printed on white paper with an … Read More
MONKEY MOUNTAIN CHALLENGE 2025: BẤT CHẤP MƯA GIÓ, TRÁI TIM VẪN HƯỚNG VỀ ĐỈNH CAO June News Bảy ngày lang thang trên đất Hàn Quốc, cộng thêm những cơn mưa lớn dai dẳng giữa mùa hè như muốn thử thách lòng người, đã khiến nhịp độ leo núi của Trần Mai chậm lại so với năm tháng đầu năm đầy sung mãn. Thế nhưng, dù thời tiết chẳng chiều lòng người, Trần Mai vẫn khép … Read More
Phiếm bàn từ “xụt bệ” với Chat GPT Sáng cuối tuần, cà phê ở quán quen, anh bạn già vừa ngồi xuống đã buông câu than: – “Cái xe đạp bữa ni xụt bệ quá, đi cà giựt cà giựt!” Nghe tới chữ “xụt bệ”, Mr. Old Man hơi khựng lại. Lâu lắm rồi mới thấy từ này bật ra từ miệng một người bạn… rặt giọng Quảng … Read More
Field 46A vs. 47A in LCs: Are All Documents Treated Equally? QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, I’ve heard of your name for years and now would like to trouble you with a question, hoping you might spare a moment for some expert advice. Are documents required under fields 46A and 47A of an LC treated equally? For example: The issuing bank and applicant agree to state the requirement for a Phytosanitary … Read More
Careful, You Might Fall for Mr. Chat GPT (Especially if you’re the type who gets a little lonely and loves a polite, soft-spoken conversationalist) This morning, over coffee, I found myself chatting with the gentlemanly Chat GPT about the word “xục bệ”. I’ve heard it now and then, but a quick Google search turned up nothing. So I turned to Chat GPT for help. After a while of … Read More