Home Mr Old Man TYPES OF LC

TYPES OF LC

7 min read
2
0
1,607

QUESTION

Dear Mr. Old Man,

This is Rookie Boy, works as an international trader, I want to ask you a question, and hope get your help.

Before creating a new LC, the applicant should send a apply letter to the issuing bank, and in the letter, there is the form as follows:

Credit Available With advising bank

[ ] By Payment

[X] By Negotiation

[ ] By Acceptance

[ ] By Deferred Payment

Against The Documents Detailed Herein

Negotiation Restricted To

[X] Advising Bank [ ] Other Bank [ ] Any Bank

Transferable With

[ ] Advising Bank [ ] Other Bank

Confirmation

[ ] Add By Advising Bank [ ] Add By Other Bank:

I always choose the same as the sample shows, and never choose other options.

And now I want to know that what do the other three options mean? For example, if I choose “By Payment”, then the Beneficiary should get the money once the bills required in LC handed onto the advising bank, is it right? and what do the other options mean?

Thanks very much. if you have work just do it first, I’m not standing waiting for the answers, I just kindly hope you can reply when you feel not so busy.

Thanks very much in advance.

Best Regards.

Rookie Boy

————-

ANSWER

Dear Rookie Boy,

An LC may be stipulated available by payment, available by negotiation, available by acceptance or available by deferred payment.

LC available by (sight) payment does not require sight drafts to be presented and normally the payment is to be effected at the counter of the issuing bank or at its nominated bank upon receipt of the complied documents. The beneficiary under LC available by payment normally may not obtain the payment in advance by negotiating (selling at a discount) the documents at his bank.

Different from LC available by payment, LC available by negotiation allows the beneficiary to receive the payment by negotiating the sight drafts and documents at a nominated negotiating bank which is normally located in his country. The negotiation may be effected on a with or without recourse basis. However, under a confirmed LC, the confirming bank must negotiate the documents on without recourse basis.

Acceptance LCs and deferred payment LCs are usance LCs. The difference is that the acceptance LC requires a time draft, whereas the deferred payment LC does not.

Under acceptance LC, the beneficiary may receive the payment before the draft is due by discounting the accepted draft at its bank or discounting it on forfaiting markets (as the accepted draft is a financial instrument which can be transferable).

Under deferred payment LC, after his presentation of complied documents, the beneficiary receives a deferred payment undertaking incurred by the issuing bank or its nominated bank. Under UCP 600 Art. 12 (b), the nominated bank is allowed to purchase (buying at a discount) its own deferred payment undertaking.

Back to your specific question. Can the beneficiary under the L/C available by payment with the advising bank get payment at sight once the complying documents are presented to the advising bank?

The answer is Yes and No.

Yes if the advising bank agrees to act on its nomination, i.e., agrees to pay as nominated by the issuing bank, and so communicates to the beneficiary.

And No if the advising bank refuses to act on its nomination. However, if the advising bank is simultaneously a confirming bank (i.e., has added its confirmation to the L/C), it must pay once the documents presented are complying. Please see UCP 600 sub-article 12 (a), which reads as follows: “Unless a nominated bank is the confirming bank, an authorization to honour or negotiate does not impose any obligation on that nominated bank to honour or negotiate, except when expressly agreed to by that nominated bank and so communicated to the beneficiary”.

Hope it is helpful.

Best regards,

Mr. Old Man

————

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Mr Old Man

2 Comments

  1. Faisal Zaheer

    February 6, 2024 at 4:57 pm

    HI MR.OLD MAN

    A Combine presentation is present to issuing bank, found discrepancy of combine presentation and issue refusal to presenting bank, However L/C is silent regarding combine presentation .

    Question is issuing bank raised the correct discrepancy . kindly guide with little explanation?

    Regards
    Faisal Zaheer

    Reply

    • Mr Old Man

      February 6, 2024 at 6:10 pm

      You are please referred to the following Q&A:
      WHERE TWO SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE PRESENTED UNDER ONE COVERING LETTER

      QUESTION

      Dear Mr. Old Man,

      The L/C allows partial shipment. Two sets of documents are presented under one covering letter for full claim amount. However, one set is compliant while the other is discrepant.

      1) Can the beneficiary make such a combined presentation?
      2) Can the issuing bank refuse two sets of documents because one set does not complying or just refuse the discrepant set and pay the complying one?
      3) Is there any ICC opinion on this case?

      Thank you.
      H.
      ………………….

      ANSWER

      1) Yes. However, it is advisable for the beneficiary to present sets of documents under separate covering letters to avoid payment delay where one set complies and the other does not.

      2) The issuing bank can refuse the set which does not comply and must honour the compliant one.

      3) Yes. Please refer to R670/TA581rev. Here is their related conclusion:

      QUOTE
      Where multiple presentations are made on the same day under the same L/C, a presenter would be well advised to create individual schedules in order to avoid any potential delays in situations where some presentations comply and others do not.

      Where more than one complete presentation of documents is made under one cover letter or schedule for the full amount of all the presentations, the presenter should be advised of the discrepancies in respect of the presentation(s) that do not comply. An issuing bank or nominated bank may request the beneficiary or presenter to provide agreement for the settlement of individual amounts for those presentation(s) that do comply. This does not negate the issuing or confirming bank’s obligation to honour the presentation(s) of documents that do comply.
      UNQUOTE

      Best regards,
      Mr. Old Man

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF EXCLUSION OF UCP 600 SUB-ARTICLE 12b?

QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, I hope my email finds you doing well I would ask you if the iss…