Home Mr Old Man FREIGHT PREPAID VS FREIGHT PAYABLE AT BASEL

FREIGHT PREPAID VS FREIGHT PAYABLE AT BASEL

6 min read
2
0
10,456

QUESTION

Dear Mr. Old Man,

LC requires: Full set of original Bills of Lading made out to order of the issuing bank marked FREIGHT PREPAID…

Presented Bill of Lading indicates “FREIGHT PREPAID” and also indicates “FREIGHT PAYABLE AT BASEL”.
Can I raise the discrepancy “Bill of Lading shows conflicting information about freight , i.e., Bill of Lading indicates “FREIGHT PREPAID” and also indicates “FREIGHT PAYABLE AT BASEL”?

Please give me your idea

Thanks and Best Regards

Nice weekends to you !

NGLC
——-
ANSWER

Hi,

No discrepancy.

Bill of Lading marked “Freight Prepaid” has satisfied the requirement. “Freight Payable at Basel” should be treated as additional information with regard to the place where freight to be paid.

Please refer to my answer to a similar question in 2011.

QUOTE

December 1, 2011

FREIGHT PREPAID OR NOT

QUESTION

Dear Nguyen,

Have you ever received B/L which claimed “freight prepaid” while with evidence showing freight not yet paid? (See the attachment)

This B/L was presented under our issued LC (the LC, under CIF basis, requires ocean B/L marking “freight prepaid”; the shipping route stipulated in the LC: port of loading – Laem Chabang, Thailand, port of discharge – Shantou, China).

We have had different internal opinions on this B/L, the main issue is that the B/L indicated “freight prepaid” and simultaneously with notation of “freight payable at Port Kelang”, from the B/L we can infer that the freight had not yet been paid when the B/L was issued, otherwise the B/L need not state “payable at port Kelang”. But it is hard to locate where is the place for freight collection (we hope
it is in the transit port) and also hard to judge when the freight is paid.

Anyway, can you tell whether the freight has been really paid when the cargo has arrived at the port of discharge?

P.S. I have also posted this question in letterofcreditforum and expected someone from shipping industry could kindly give us some explanation. Also I thank Abrar for generous sharing comment on this in the forum, although I think this issue has not yet clarified.

Best regards
Sheilar

————————————————

ANSWER

Dear Sheilar,

I have checked the attached B/L and understood that Laem Chabang, Thailand is the port of loading and Shantou, China is the port of discharge.

I also understand that “freight prepaid” would mean the freight has been prepaid by the shipper and that “freight payable” would mean the freight is to be paid at the port of discharge or at the final destination.

In my own opinion, the B/L that indicates “freight prepaid” has satisfied the L/C requirement. The statement “freight payable at Port Kelang” should be treated as additional information. When the carrier states in its B/L that the freight has been prepaid or similar wording, “freight prepaid”, they cannot claim freight from the consignee.

Best regards,

Nguyen Huu Duc
———————————–

Thank you, Nguyen.

I have also got some significant response from my customer (an exporter). She said that when they sign export contract their importer customer on FOB basis, who was actually a middleman and may sign a further contract with the ultimate buyer on CIF basis, then when they arranged shipment and finally got a bill of lading, the bill of lading would indicate freight payable at xxx (e.g. Hong Kong, the place of the middleman). … So I think wording of “freight prepaid” was aimed to comply with the LC requirement and “payable at some point of transit” was some kind of arrangement (which was similar to Abrar’s opinion.)

Anyway, as long as the B/L did not say “payable at destination by the consignee”, I think it is acceptable.

Thank you

Sheilar

UNQUOTE

Kind regards,
Mr. Old Man

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Mr Old Man

2 Comments

  1. DOM

    February 18, 2021 at 4:54 am

    C/P BL SHOWING BOTH “FREIGHT PREPAID” AND “FREIGHT PAYABLE AS PER CHARTER PARTY DATED….”

    LC INDICATES BL MARKED FREIGHT PREPAID” OR “FREIGHT PAYABLE AS PER CHARTER PARTY ACCEPTABLE .

    WILL BL MARKED BOTH FREIGHT DETAILS ARE CONFLICTED EACH OTHER ?

    Reply

    • Mr Old Man

      February 18, 2021 at 2:44 pm

      According to UCP 600 sub-article 14(d), the CPBL appears to be discrepant as it indicates both “Freight Prepaid” and “Freight payable as per Charter Party”, which conflict. It should indicate either “Freight Prepaid” or “Freight payable as per Charter Party”.
      Not sure but this view could be controversial. The fact that the CPBL indicates Freight Prepaid satisfies the LC terms. “Freight payable as per Charter Party” should be treated as additional information about freight.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

QUESTION REGARDING THE TRANSFERRING BANK’S LIABILTY UNDER THE TRANSFERRED LC

QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, Em có 2 câu hỏi về LC chuyển nhượng như sau: Khi người thụ hưởn…