Articles Mr Old Man eUCP Version 2.0 ARTICLE e4 By Mr Old Man Posted on July 25, 2019 3 min read 0 0 2,121 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Reddit Share on Pinterest Share on Linkedin Share on Tumblr Chào các bạn, Hôm nay chúng ta tiếp tục eUCP với Điều e4 ngắn chỉ 1 câu, nếu đọc luôn cả lời bình nữa cũng không quá ½ trang. Điều e4 eUCP giống y chang Điều 5 UCP, chỉ khác nhau “ electronic record or paper document” (chứng từ điện tử hoặc chứng từ bằng giấy) thay vì “document” (chứng từ). Điều e4 eUCP quy định các ngân hàng không giao dịch với hàng hóa, dịch vụ hoặc các thực hiện mà CHỨNG TỪ ĐIỆN TỬ HOẶC CHỨNG TỪ BẰNG GIẤY có liên quan, trong khi Điều 5 UCP 600 quy định rằng các ngân hàng giao dịch trên cơ sở chứng từ chứ không phải hàng hóa, dịch vụ hoặc các thực hiện mà CHỨNG TỪ có liên quan. Chúc các bạn vui vẻ. Mr. Old Man —– ARTICLE e4 ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND PAPER DOCUMENTS V. GOODS, SERVICES OR PERFORMANCE Banks do not deal with the goods, services or performance to which an electronic record or paper document may relate. CHANGES FROM eUCP VERSION 1.1 • New article COMMENTARY This article was not included in previous versions of the eUCP. The format ‘v’ is used in order to maintain consistency with existing rules such as UCP 600 and URBPO 745. USE IN UCP 600 The structure of this article is aligned in order to follow the construction of UCP 600 article 5 (Documents v. Goods, Services or Performance). RATIONALE FOR INCLUSION WITHIN eUCP UCP 600 article 5 does not address electronic records. The addition of ‘electronic records’ in the eUCP is a key difference. Whilst it is acknowledged that the definition of ‘documents’ includes ‘electronic records’, it is considered that this article provides further clarity and transparency.
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?