When Four Routing Fields Appear… but the LC Still Asks for an AWB Every now and then, Mr. Old Man receives a question that quietly whispers: “Somebody drafted this LC on a Friday afternoon…” Today’s case is one of those — when the LC includes all four routing fields (44A, 44E, 44F, 44B) but still requires an Air Waybill. Let’s untangle the knot. QUESTION Dear Sir, Under airfreight with EXW – Seller’s Factory … Read More
Feeder Vs. Ocean Vessel: Which One Must the On Board Notation Indicate? Intro Under a port-to-port LC (fields 44E and 44F), the bank expects a marine bill of lading that evidences shipment on board the ocean-going vessel performing the voyage from the stated port of loading to the stated port of discharge. In practice, many BLs also show a pre-carriage or feeder vessel, and this sometimes leads to an on-board notation being … Read More
Can the Issuing Bank Refuse Based on the Applicant’s ‘Late Sailing’ Investigation? INTRO Every now and then, Mr. Old Man receives a question that perfectly illustrates how easily a clean, compliant LC presentation can get tangled when buyers panic—usually when prices fall. And very often, someone in the chain suddenly “investigates” and claims the vessel sailed late… even though the Bill of Lading says otherwise. So here’s a real case from India … Read More
TOLERANCE — UNDERSTANDING SUB-ARTICLE 30(c) INTRO Understanding sub-article 30(c) of UCP 600 can be tricky, especially when an LC specifies a fixed quantity and unit price. Many practitioners wonder how the credit amount can be reduced without causing a discrepancy. In this Q&A, Mr. Old Man clarifies the purpose of the 5% tolerance rule and illustrates it with a practical CIF example. QUESTION Dear Mr. … Read More
Can a Beneficiary Present Directly to the Issuing Bank? Intro In the world of letters of credit, everyone loves a shortcut — especially when it promises faster payment. It’s no surprise that beneficiaries often ask Mr. Old Man: “Why don’t I just send the documents straight to the issuing bank? Wouldn’t that speed things up? The confirming bank can be skipped, right?” It sounds simple, but in LC operations, … Read More
Unit Price in Invoice vs. Proforma Invoice – Discrepancy or Not? Intro Again, folks! Time for another round of LC puzzles with Mr. Old Man. This week’s classic case comes from the Himalayas (yes, the literal Himalayas!) where our friend Suraj at Himalayan Bank is wondering: “If the unit price in a presented commercial invoice differs from what was in the proforma invoice used when the LC was issued—but the LC … Read More
Freight Collect Vs. Freight As Arranged – Discrepancy or Not? Quick Question, Quick Answer by Mr. Old Man — 30 Seconds. Too fast too furious??? Read More
LC Document Compliance: Consignee Details on Certificate of Origin vs Bill of Lading Understanding ISBP 821 L5 — A Practical Q&A In trade finance, it’s not uncommon for exporters and document checkers to wonder how far they can “stretch” consignee information on different documents without triggering a discrepancy — especially when a bill of lading is issued “to order” and the certificate of origin (C/O) needs to name a consignee. This question from … Read More
Insurance Documents Under LC – Clarifications on Endorsement, Issuance, and Coverage Dear Mr. Old Man, Greetings of the day. Hope this email finds you well. I would like to seek your opinion/clarification for the below scenario. All these doubts pertain to the insurance document presented under a Letter of Credit (LC). Query 1 LC Requirement: Insurance in negotiable form and blank endorsed. Scenario: The insurance document shows the assured as the … Read More
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two … Read More