July 03, 2026
  • Contact

Mr. Old Man For those who eat, sleep and breathe Letters of Credit & Cycling

  • Home
  • Articles

    Đen đẹp mà

    Một chút duyên với báo Tuổi Trẻ

    Cái gác-măng-rê

    500 km, 50 bài và… 0 đồng doanh thu!

    Giant và bãi Hẳm dưới núi Hải Vân 11 năm trước

  • Lifestyle

    Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực

    Đen đẹp mà

    Một chút duyên với báo Tuổi Trẻ

    Cái gác-măng-rê

    500 km, 50 bài và… 0 đồng doanh thu!

  • Discovery on the cycling road

    Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực

    Đen đẹp mà

    500 km, 50 bài và… 0 đồng doanh thu!

    Bà cụ rùa mất rồi!

    “Ngôi làng đã mất” giờ mất thiệt rồi!

  • Q&A
  • Popular
3 New Articles
  • 14 hours ago Contact Names in LC Addresses: Must They Appear on Certificates?
  • 14 hours ago Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực
  • 2 days ago Đen đẹp mà
Home Mr Old Man Payment (page 11)

Payment

EXW Incoterms and the AWB Trap: A Recipe for Confusion?

By Mr Old Man
January 13, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
124

Intro In documentary credit practice, mismatches between Incoterms® rules and LC document requirements are a frequent source of confusion — and disputes. One such classic mismatch arises when a credit issued under EXW Incoterms nevertheless requires the presentation of an air waybill (AWB). Is this automatically wrong? Or merely risky?  A reader raised the issue bluntly — and rightly so. …

Read More

Who Is Responsible When an Original Bill of Lading Is Lost, Mislaid, or Destroyed?

By Mr Old Man
January 10, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
229

(This Q&A is excerpted from a discussion by the Trade Services Update editors (LCM_QUERY 2026-01) Intro In documentary credit practice, the loss of an original bill of lading after a complying presentation has been made often gives rise to confusion between payment obligations under a letter of credit and the practical arrangements required to obtain delivery of the goods. Parties …

Read More

When an LC Makes Payment Subject to Buyer–Seller Disputes

By Mr Old Man
January 8, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
92

Intro One of the core principles of a documentary credit is that payment depends solely on complying documents, not on disputes arising from the underlying commercial contract. From time to time, however, beneficiaries encounter LCs that attempt to dilute this principle by inserting clauses linking payment to buyer–seller disputes. The following Q&A addresses such a case and explains why these …

Read More

Drafts under Letters of Credit: Common Confusions and Practical Answers

By Mr Old Man
January 8, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
280

Intro Drafts (bills of exchange) are among the most misunderstood elements in documentary credit practice. Although UCP 600 and ISBP 821 provide guidance, inconsistent LC drafting and legacy habits continue to cause confusion—especially when drafts are mentioned in some fields of the LC but not listed as required documents. In the Q&A below, Mr. Old Man responds to a set …

Read More

MUST COURIER RECEIPT INDICATE CONTRACT NUMBER AND DATE?

By Mr Old Man
January 4, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
118

  Intro In LC practice, refusals often arise not because a document is missing, but because banks read documentary requirements in isolation rather than in context. One recurring issue is whether supporting evidence attached to a required document must independently comply with a general condition such as “all documents must show contract number and date”. The following Q&A illustrates why …

Read More

BRANCHES OF A BANK IN THE SAME COUNTRY

By Mr Old Man
January 3, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
139

Intro There have been cases where an issuing bank refused to honour a credit on the grounds that the beneficiary presented the documents at a branch other than the branch expressly nominated in the LC, even though both branches belong to the same bank and are located in the same country. In such cases, the beneficiary is unable to re-present …

Read More

When an Invoice Exceeds the LC Amount: Understanding UCP 600 Sub-Article 18(b)

By Mr Old Man
January 2, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
160

Intro In LC practice, commercial invoices are often treated as rigid documents that must strictly mirror the credit amount. However, UCP 600 allows for a degree of flexibility — provided banks understand where discretion ends and obligation begins. One such provision is UCP 600 sub-article 18(b), which deals with invoices issued for amounts exceeding the LC value. The following Q&A …

Read More

Split Payments Under an LC: 80% of Invoice Amount or 80% of LC Amount?

By Mr Old Man
December 29, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
148

Intro Credits that split payment between shipment and installation often cause confusion when partial shipments are involved. The key question is whether payment should be linked to a percentage of the invoice or a percentage of the LC amount. Question Dear Mr. Old Man, We have an LC for USD 10,000, available by payment. The LC provides: * 80% payable …

Read More

A DAILY CASE STUDY STORY

By Mr Old Man
December 28, 2025
in :  Articles, Mr Old Man, Payment
0
68

(Vietnamese version below) On this day, eight years ago, Mr. Old Man shared his last case study and said goodbye — rather reluctantly — to his passion project, “A Daily Case Study on International Payments and Trade Finance.” But then… life had other plans. International Payments and Trade Finance truly turned out to be a kind of calling. And that …

Read More

Insurance Endorsement under an LC: “Endorsed to Bank” or “To the Order of Bank”?

By Mr Old Man
December 27, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
208

Intro Insurace documents under letters of credit often create confusion—especially when beneficiaries apply bill of lading concepts to insurance policies or certificates. One recurring grey area is whether an insurance document should be endorsed “to” a named bank or “to the order of” that bank, particularly when the credit expressly requires the document to be transferable. The following Q&A addresses …

Read More
1...101112...50Page 11 of 50

About me

Recent Posts

Contact Names in LC Addresses: Must They Appear on Certificates?

Mr Old Man
14 hours ago

Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực

Mr Old Man
14 hours ago

Đen đẹp mà

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Một chút duyên với báo Tuổi Trẻ

Mr Old Man
3 days ago
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • Tags

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

FIELD 72 (SENDER TO RECEIVER INFORMATION) OF MT 103

Mr Old Man
March 8, 2010

TRANSFERRING BANK S LIABILITY UNDER TRANSFERRED LC

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Contact Names in LC Addresses: Must They Appear on Certificates?

Mr Old Man
14 hours ago

Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực

Mr Old Man
14 hours ago

Đen đẹp mà

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Một chút duyên với báo Tuổi Trẻ

Mr Old Man
3 days ago

Rupnarayan Bose: I fully agree with this view. What the UCP says is the minimum obligation of the...

Mr Old Man: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/banco-santander-sa-v-804497513...

Khandakar Ali Akbar: Hello Sir, Hope you're doing well. Can you share court case (in details) between...

Pieter Muus: Dear Mr. Old Man, please allow me to seek your guidance in the matter of nominat...

Facebook Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 negotiation Insurance Documents lost in transit Amendment confirmation fraud On board notation DRAFTS SBLC CPBL notify party Chat GPT Mr Old Man Chợ Nồi Rang Late presentation Surrendered bill of lading expiry-date lc-expired Revolving LC Insurance document invoice Tà Lang non-documentary conditions

Follow Me

Popular posts

PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B)

Mr Old Man
October 19, 2015

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

WHETHER MT999 IS AN AUTHENTICATED SWIFT MESSAGE

Mr Old Man
July 31, 2018

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Travel

EARLY PRESENTATION

Mr Old Man
September 11, 2017

QUESTION Dear Mr Old Man, I am Dang from Vietnam Prosperity bank. I know …

Timeline

  • July 29, 2024

    LẠI THÊM MỘT LẦN HỘI NGỘ TUYỆT VỜI, LẠI THÊM MỘT LẦN ĐỂ NHỚ

  • April 25, 2025

    BACK TO GÒ NỔI AGAIN

  • June 21, 2022

    FRAUD OR NOT?

  • February 28, 2026

    Disillusionment in the Age of AI — When Your Idol Turns Out to Be Just an Algorithm

  • June 19, 2015

    WHETHER A NOMINATED BANK CAN NEGOTIATE DRAFTS DRAWN ON ITSELF

  • September 9, 2024

    NEXT TIME DON’T BOMBARD MR. OLD MAN WITH TOO MANY QUESTIONS AT ONCE

Top Tags Amendment Chợ Nồi Rang Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 DRAFTS confirmation fraud SBLC On board notation Chat GPT Documents lost in transit negotiation Facebook notify party CPBL Insurance
© Copyright 2014 - 2017 | Mr Old Man Theme by ThietKeWebDaNang.Com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Cuongnq