Home Uncategorized RETURNING THE DISCREPANT DOCUMENTS

RETURNING THE DISCREPANT DOCUMENTS

5 min read
4
0
2,665

by Old Man on Friday, November 11, 2011 at 3:15pm
QUESTION
.
Hi Mr. Old Man,
.
I have read a lot of your helpful writings about L/C and am extremely impressed by your deep knowledge on L/C issues. Could you please help me to deal with the following case:
At the request of the applicant, and as the applicant and the beneficiary have had long-term and reliable business relationship, we issued a L/C at sight as follows:
46A: Documents required: 3/3 of original of clean “shipped on board” Ocean Bill of lading consigned to the applicant, 2/3 of B/L sent to issuing bank, 1/3 of B/L sent directly to the applicant.
When the presenting bank presented the docs to our bank, we found that the docs are discrepant under L/C terms and conditions. We sent an MT734 to the presenting bank stating discrepancies and indicate that we hold docs at the presenting bank’s risk and disposal.
As to applicant, after receiving our advice of discrepancies, they refused to make payment and requested to return docs whereas they already picked up the goods.
4 months pass by, but we haven’t received any response from the presenting bank. According to sub-article 16e – UCP600, we can return docs at any time after we sent an advice of refusal citing discrepancies. However, we would like to hear your opinion regarding this matter. What should we do now?
.
Thanks very much for your kind support!
NTH
————————————————–
ANSWER
.
Hi,
.
Thank you for your compliment.
.
If 1/3 bill of lading consigned to the applicant are sent direct to the applicant, the beneficiary bears the risk of losing control over the goods while the issuing bank may refuse to honour if the documents presented do not comply. A wise bank will never agree to negotiate such documents. This could be the reason why the presenting bank has kept silent as to your bank’s refusal due to valid discrepancies. If needed, the beneficiary may take legal action against the applicant before the court to claim payment from the applicant.
.
I wonder why your bank has kept the documents for such a long time. In accordance with sub-article 16 (e), you can return the documents to the presenter at any time if you have give a notice of refusal in accordance with sub-article 16(c) (iii) (a) or (b) no later the close of the fifth banking days following the day of receipt of the documents.
Please note that the documents including the bills of lading should be returned as they were received (e.g., no endorsement back to the shipper/beneficiary even when the bill of lading is made out to the order of the issuing bank).
.
Best regards,
Mr. Old Man

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Uncategorized

4 Comments

  1. anonymous

    November 12, 2011 at 3:11 am

    Monir writes:DearIn this case, did issuing bank act as per article 16? (Holding the documents long 4 months)RgdsMonir

    Reply

  2. mroldmanvcb

    November 12, 2011 at 9:11 pm

    If the issuing bank chooses option 16 (c)(iii)(a), i.e., stating in its notice of refusal that it is holding the documents pending further instructions from the presenter, it may hold the documents so long as it has not received further instructions from the presenter.

    Reply

  3. Ka

    June 6, 2014 at 1:19 pm

    Dear Mr OldMan,
    Could you please answer this question? In case the presentation is COMPLYING, can the nego.bank recall the shipping documents irrespective that the appl. does not agree with this action? What’s the differences if our bank is the transferring bank and the bank recalling the docs is the 2nd bene’s bank?
    Awaiting your soonest reply
    Thank you,

    Reply

    • mroldman

      June 6, 2014 at 2:58 pm

      Hi,

      Hi,
      I must say your issue is not covered in UCP. It is the issuing bank that will decide whether or not it should comply with the negotiating bank’s request for returning the documents. The issuing bank should also ask for the applicant’s agreement if it has advised the applicant of the presentation of complying documents. The issuing bank cannot comply with the negotiating bank’s request if the documents have been released to the applicant who does not agree to return the documents.

      The answer is the same if the transferring bank has advised the first beneficiary of the presentation and the first beneficiary would like to substitute the documents (invoice and drafts) rather than return the documents to the second beneficiary.

      Kind regards,
      Mr. Old Man

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

POTENTIAL FRAUD IN SCRAP METAL TRADE: A RISKY DEAL?

QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, My name is Th., and I am currently living and working in Ho Chi…