Home Uncategorized ON BOARD NOTATION 4

ON BOARD NOTATION 4

5 min read
2
0
3,886

________________________________________
QUERY
________________________________________
From: S.
Sent: Tue 10/19/2010 9:07 PM
To: Nguyen Huu Duc (DNG)
Subject: on-board-notation

Dear Nguyen Huu Duc,

I'd like to ask you another thing about on-board-notation. The ICC's Recommendation Paper on on-board-notation has been ractified for a while but it seems that no one wants to have the first try: the presented B/Ls I've seen are still as usual, e.g. when "place of receipt"is different from the "port of loading" with the preprinted wording"shipped in good order and condition", forwarders usually follow the former practice, i.e. indicates a full on-board-notation in the B/L including the on-board date, vessel name and port of loading, even though no indication of the means of precarriage. These are perhaps not necessary as per the ICC Recommendation Paper 2.9.

But there is one exception:

Suppose the LC require a B/L, 44e: Port L, 44f:Port of discharge:Port D
the presented B/L indicating: Place of receipt: Place A (marked with *)
Port of loading:Port L
Port of discharge:Port D
Preprinted wording: "shipped in good order and condition …" and * only applicable to Combined Transport Bill of lading",
Then what does the wording of "shipped …" apply to? the place of receipt or port of loading?

Do you think whether it need an extra on-board-notaion or not?

Best regards
S.
________________________________________
COMMENT
________________________________________
From: Nguyen Huu Duc (DNG)
Sent: Wed 10/20/2010 10:28 AM
To: S.
Subject: RE: on-board-notation

Dear S.,

Not all carriers, bankers or traders have the same opportunity as ours to have in hand the ICC’s Recommendation Paper on On-Board Notation. So, it needs time to change old practices.
Previously, to avoid discrepancies regarding on-board notation, some prudent bankers would advise the beneficiary to present B/L with a full on board notation including date, vessel name and port of loading notwithstanding that in some cases a full on-board notation is not needed.

It is correct that according to the said paper, where the bill of lading indicates a place of receipt that is different from the port of loading BUT there is NO indication of a means of pre-carriage (either in the pre-carriage field or the place of receipt field) then if the bill of lading is pre-printed shipped on board, the date of issue will be deemed to be the date of shipment and no further on board notation is required.

It is understood from your description that the B/L presented appears to be a Combined Transport Documents. However, ICC recommended in the said paper that transport documents be examined under the article that is applicable to the conditions stated in the L/C. LC calls for B/L with field 44E and field 44F, hence, the B/L presented is to be examined under article 20 and not article 19. In accordance with ICC’s conclusions regarding B/L point (b) (i) of the recommendation, the pre-printed shipped on board is understood to be applicable to the port of loading and no further on board is needed.

Best regards,

Nguyen Huu Duc

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Mr Old Man
Load More In Uncategorized

2 Comments

  1. machowdhury

    October 2, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    Can u help me understanding ISBP paragraph 96?.What I understood that in case of preprinted "Received for Shipment" B/L, there must be an on-board notation for the shipment date.In case of preprinted "shipped on board" B/L, no on board notation required since B/L is issued after the goods have been loaded on board..But in the para 96 what does it mean by "unless it bears a separate dated on board notation"….What is the circumstance here? Why should B/L require another notation for shipment date whereas it is issued after the goods have been shipped?

    Reply

  2. mroldmanvcb

    October 4, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    Hi,It is agreed that a pre-printed ‘received for shipment’ bill of lading needs an on board notation. It is also agreed that there are pre-printed ‘shipped on board’ bills of lading do not need an additional notation on board, but there are some pre-printed ‘shipped on board’ bills of lading that need a separate on board notation. Where a pre-printed ‘shipped on board’ bill of lading indicates the place of receipt with no reference to the means of pre-carriage in the and/or a mean of pre-carriage in the pre-carriage or place of receipt fields, an on board notation, or pre-printed wording to that effect can only be seen to apply to the named vessel and port of loading. However, where a bill of lading shows a place of receipt and/or a means of pre-carriage, there is confusion/doubt as to whether such pre-printed on board notation or pre-printed wording refers to the named vessel and port of loading. Therefore, where a pre-printed ‘shipped on board’ bill of lading indicates the place of receipt and a mean of pre-carriage, a separate on board notation showing the named vessel (the ocean vessel), the port of loading and the date on board is needed to eliminate this confusion/doubt.I would like you to refer to ICC Document No.470/1128rev final – 22 April 2010 -Recommendations of the Banking Commission in respect of the requirements for an On board Notation (paragraphs 2.1 – 2.9 and the conclusion) to understand why and which pre-printed ‘shipped on board’ bills of lading need a separate on board notation.If you do not have the above document, give me your email and I’ll forward you a soft copy.Best regards,Mr. Old Man

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

POTENTIAL FRAUD IN SCRAP METAL TRADE: A RISKY DEAL?

QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, My name is Th., and I am currently living and working in Ho Chi…