August 14, 2026
  • Contact

Mr. Old Man For those who eat, sleep and breathe Letters of Credit & Cycling

  • Home
  • Articles

    Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?

    Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

    Lái xe công nghệ: Tự do hay tự lo?

    Đà Nẵng – Thành phố xe đạp: Mr. Old Man sai rồi!

    Thay avatar

  • Lifestyle

    Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?

    Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

    Lái xe công nghệ: Tự do hay tự lo?

    Đà Nẵng – Thành phố xe đạp: Mr. Old Man sai rồi!

    Thay avatar

  • Discovery on the cycling road

    Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?

    Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

    Đà Nẵng – Thành phố xe đạp: Mr. Old Man sai rồi!

    Ừ thì “ngo như bù”!

    Chơi Facebook cũng… áp lực

  • Q&A
  • Popular
3 New Articles
  • 6 hours ago Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?
  • 24 hours ago Who Should Endorse a Charter Party Bill of Lading?
  • 2 days ago Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️
Home Mr Old Man Q&A (page 16)

Q&A

Short Shipment or Not?

By Mr Old Man
December 12, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
128

Clarifying Quantity Requirements When an LC Covers Multiple Lots In practice, letters of credit covering multiple lots of goods often give rise to misunderstandings about whether each lot may be shipped separately — and how the limit on the number of shipments should be interpreted.  On this occasion, let’s take a look at an interesting scenario raised by our colleague …

Read More

FREIGHT PREPAID VS FREIGHT PAYABLE AT DESTINATION — A LOOK BACK AS TA.958 APPROACHES

By Mr Old Man
December 11, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A, Uncategorized
0
191

INTRODUCTION With Technical Advisor Opinion TA.958 now on the table—specifically the question of whether a bill of lading showing both “freight prepaid” and “freight payable at D” should be considered conflicting under a credit that explicitly requires the document to be marked “freight prepaid”—the trade finance community is once again paying close attention. As we all know, the ICC Banking …

Read More

When CIF/CIP Value Cannot Be Determined — How Should the Invoice Be Issued?

By Mr Old Man
December 11, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
221

Intro In practice, banks and beneficiaries often face uncertainty when a credit requires a CIF or CIP term but does not state how freight or insurance should be shown. Must the invoice break them down? What if the actual freight or insurance charges are unknown at the time of issuing documents? Mr. Old Man shares some guidance based on ISBP …

Read More

Negotiation with Recourse vs. Negotiation without Recourse — What’s the Real Difference?

By Mr Old Man
December 10, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
295

Introduction In export financing, the terms with recourse and without recourse often cause confusion, especially when applied to negotiation under LCs or discounting of drafts under collections. Although both methods provide early funding to exporters, the underlying risk allocation—and therefore the pricing and discounting ratios—are very different.  Below is Mr. Old Man’s explanation to a reader who asked why banks …

Read More

Applicant vs. Consignee on a Certificate of Origin — Does It Matter?

By Mr Old Man
December 9, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
1
324

A Practical Q&A with Mr. Old Man In documentary credit work, applicants, consignees, and importers often end up being the same party, yet the terminology on document templates is rarely consistent. A common question is: If the LC asks for the “Applicant,” but the COO form only provides space for the “Consignee,” will banks treat that as a discrepancy? Let’s …

Read More

When a Confirming Bank Adds Its Own Sanctions Clause — Is It Allowed?

By Mr Old Man
December 8, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
125

Introduction Sanctions clauses continue to create operational challenges in documentary credit practice, especially when multiple banks apply different compliance standards. A common problem arises when the confirming bank adds its own sanctions requirement, even though the issuing bank has already inserted a sanctions clause in the LC.  In this Q&A, we look at a real case involving an LC issued …

Read More

CIF Breakdown and “Irrespective of Percentage” – Two Common LC Questions

By Mr Old Man
December 8, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
298

In today’s LC practice, two issues appear repeatedly and often cause confusion for both exporters and bankers. The first is whether an invoice under CIF or CFR must show a cost breakdown, especially the insurance premium. Many presentations include partial breakdowns—or even show freight as zero—raising the question of whether such invoices are compliant when the LC itself is silent. …

Read More

How Should Issuance Commission Be Calculated for a Revolving LC with Declining Exposure?

By Mr Old Man
December 5, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
140

Intro: A practitioner raised a practical question regarding the appropriate method for computing issuance commission on a cumulative revolving LC, especially when the bank’s exposure changes over time. Below is the refined question and Mr. Old Man’s response. Question  Dear Mr. Old Man, I would appreciate your guidance on the following: We have a cumulative revolving LC issued for USD …

Read More

Can the Drawee’s Bank Cancel Its Aval after Confirming it by SWIFT?

By Mr Old Man
December 5, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
139

A Q&A with Mr. Old Man When dealing with documentary collections, many bankers assume that an aval—once issued—is as solid as steel. But what happens when an avaling bank suddenly cancels its commitment, cites problems with the underlying goods, and even goes to court? In this Q&A, Mr. Old Man breaks down how avalization really works, which rules govern it, …

Read More

Is a Deduction Allowed on the Invoice When the LC Does Not Call for It?

By Mr Old Man
December 5, 2025
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
188

Introduction In trade finance practice, many beneficiaries issue invoices showing deductions — such as discounts, credit notes, or advance payment adjustments — even when the LC does not expressly authorise such deductions. This often raises the question: Is the presentation still acceptable under the LC? Below is today’s question from Rohini. QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, The LC does not …

Read More
1...151617...74Page 16 of 74

About me

Recent Posts

Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?

Mr Old Man
6 hours ago

Who Should Endorse a Charter Party Bill of Lading?

Mr Old Man
24 hours ago

Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Late Presentation: Does the Nominated Bank’s Certification Protect the Presentation?

Mr Old Man
3 days ago
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • Tags

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

FIELD 72 (SENDER TO RECEIVER INFORMATION) OF MT 103

Mr Old Man
March 8, 2010

TRANSFERRING BANK S LIABILITY UNDER TRANSFERRED LC

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Cấm trekking tự phát thì trekking có tổ chức sao đây?

Mr Old Man
6 hours ago

Who Should Endorse a Charter Party Bill of Lading?

Mr Old Man
24 hours ago

Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Late Presentation: Does the Nominated Bank’s Certification Protect the Presentation?

Mr Old Man
3 days ago

Anonymous: Thank you for your reply. Yes, it was in the notify party details. It made me he...

Mr Old Man: I assume this email address appears in the notify party details. If the credit s...

Anonymous: Hi Mr. Old Man , What about the case where the email in the BL appears as "ABCST...

Rupnarayan Bose: I fully agree with this view. What the UCP says is the minimum obligation of the...

Facebook Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 Documents lost in transit negotiation Insurance fraud Amendment confirmation place-of-expiry On board notation DRAFTS Late presentation Insurance document SBLC CPBL notify party Chợ Nồi Rang Messi endorsement Force Majeure Chat GPT Mr Old Man invoice Surrendered bill of lading expiry-date

Follow Me

Popular posts

PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B)

Mr Old Man
October 19, 2015

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

WHETHER MT999 IS AN AUTHENTICATED SWIFT MESSAGE

Mr Old Man
July 31, 2018

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Travel

EARLY PRESENTATION

Mr Old Man
September 11, 2017

QUESTION Dear Mr Old Man, I am Dang from Vietnam Prosperity bank. I know …

Timeline

  • March 7, 2010

    KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER

  • May 31, 2025

    MONKEY MOUNTAIN CHALLENGE 2025: TIME TO FLY!

  • December 4, 2025

    Các ngân hàng thu phí quản lý tài khoản có đúng không?

  • May 31, 2024

    WHICH PARTY WILL PAY CONFIRMATION FEES?

  • October 13, 2014

    WHETHER A NOMINATED BANK IS A CONFIRMING BANK

  • February 26, 2020

    LẠI NHỚ CUNG ĐƯỜNG GIẾNG TRỜI VỪA ĐI VỪA KHÓC

Top Tags Documents lost in transit Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 On board notation Insurance document Insurance Amendment Facebook Late presentation fraud negotiation confirmation SBLC DRAFTS place-of-expiry invoice
© Copyright 2014 - 2017 | Mr Old Man Theme by ThietKeWebDaNang.Com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Cuongnq