September 02, 2026
  • Contact

Mr. Old Man For those who eat, sleep and breathe Letters of Credit & Cycling

  • Home
  • Articles

    AI quản lý ai?

    Mr. Old Man Tries Taco: Is TACO Better Than Bánh Mì or Bánh Xèo?

    Mr. Old Man thử món Taco: TACO này có ngon hơn bánh mì, bánh xèo không?

    Will Trump Avenue in Ottawa Become Taco Avenue!?

    Đại lộ Trump ở Ottawa sẽ đổi thành Đại lộ TACO!?

  • Lifestyle

    AI quản lý ai?

    Mr. Old Man Tries Taco: Is TACO Better Than Bánh Mì or Bánh Xèo?

    Mr. Old Man thử món Taco: TACO này có ngon hơn bánh mì, bánh xèo không?

    Will Trump Avenue in Ottawa Become Taco Avenue!?

    Đại lộ Trump ở Ottawa sẽ đổi thành Đại lộ TACO!?

  • Discovery on the cycling road

    Hope Hoffman và niềm vui kép

    Hope Hoffman and Double the Joy

    Cấm trekking tự phát, vậy trekking có tổ chức thì sao?

    Chỉ đạp xe khám phá thôi mà… ‍♂️

    Đà Nẵng – Thành phố xe đạp: Mr. Old Man sai rồi!

  • Q&A
  • Popular
3 New Articles
  • 1 day ago AI quản lý ai?
  • 2 days ago Mr. Old Man Tries Taco: Is TACO Better Than Bánh Mì or Bánh Xèo?
  • 2 days ago Can an LC Be Amended After Documents Have Been Presented?
Home Mr Old Man Payment (page 15)

Payment

Negotiation vs. Discounting under LCs: What’s the Difference?

By Mr Old Man
January 29, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
351

Introduction In practice, the terms negotiation and discounting are often used interchangeably in letter of credit (LC) transactions. However, under UCP 600, they are not the same. This Q&A clarifies the distinction—especially when an LC is available with a nominated bank by negotiation.  QUESTION Hi, I would like to understand the difference between negotiation and discounting, particularly in cases where …

Read More

Understanding MT 700 Fields 39A and 39B – Amount Tolerance Explained

By Mr Old Man
January 25, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
501

Intro In SWIFT MT 700, Fields 39A and 39B are often referred to as “tolerance Fields”. Although both relate to the credit amount, they serve different purposes and lead to very different practical outcomes. This Q&A explains the distinction and when each Field is typically used. Question Dear Sir, Good day! I have some doubts on Tolerance Field39A and 39B. …

Read More

Cable Negotiation Explained: Benefits, Risks, and Practical Reality under LCs

By Mr Old Man
January 20, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
424

Intro In LC practice, the term “cable negotiation” is sometimes mentioned by beneficiaries and banks, even though it does not appear in UCP 600. This Q&A clarifies what “cable negotiation” means in practice, how it works, and the benefits and risks involved for each party when discrepant documents are presented. QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, My name is HY. I …

Read More

Does an Inter – Bank Courier Clause Override the LC Presentation Period?

By Mr Old Man
January 19, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
144

Intro  Letters of Credit sometimes contain additional conditions that blur the line between presentation by the beneficiary and document handling between banks. When such clauses are poorly drafted, the question inevitably arises: can an issuing bank turn an internal routing instruction into a discrepancy? The following Q&A addresses one such situation involving Fields 47A and 48. QUESTION Dear Sir, LC …

Read More

WHEN WORDS AND FIGURES DON’T AGREE: Is It a Discrepancy under UCP 600?

By Mr Old Man
January 17, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
2
344

Intro Differences between the amount in words and the amount in figures are among the most common issues encountered in document examination under letters of credit. At first glance, such inconsistencies appear to be straightforward discrepancies. However, practice shows that the answer is not always the same, particularly when a bill of exchange (draft) is involved. While UCP 600 establishes …

Read More

CAN A BANK ISSUE A PHYSICAL BANK GUARANTEE WITHOUT LOCAL PRESENCE?

By Mr Old Man
January 16, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
217

INTRO In practice, bank guarantees are often treated as if they must be issued or advised through a local bank in the beneficiary’s country. This assumption frequently leads to confusion between legal possibility and market or tender requirements, especially when physical bank guarantees are involved. The following question raises a simple but important issue: Can a bank issue a physical …

Read More

How to Calculate “Within 21 Days of Shipment” under ISBP 821

By Mr Old Man
January 14, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
357

Intro  Time calculations under Letters of Credit often look simple, yet the word “within” continues to cause confusion — especially when readers focus on the example given in ISBP 821 paragraph A14(b)(i) and wonder whether the permitted period should extend both before and after the shipment date.  The following Q&A addresses a very practical question: When an LC requires documents …

Read More

“Discrepancy Traps” in Letters of Credit: Should Beneficiaries Hold Their Ground?

By Mr Old Man
January 14, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
131

Intro From time to time, beneficiaries find themselves facing draft Letters of Credit containing conditions that appear unnecessary, impractical, or even deliberately risky. Are these merely poor drafting practices, or are they “discrepancy traps” waiting to happen?  In the following exchange, Mr. Old Man shares his views on how sellers should respond when confronted with such LCs — and why …

Read More

EXW Incoterms and the AWB Trap: A Recipe for Confusion?

By Mr Old Man
January 13, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
162

Intro In documentary credit practice, mismatches between Incoterms® rules and LC document requirements are a frequent source of confusion — and disputes. One such classic mismatch arises when a credit issued under EXW Incoterms nevertheless requires the presentation of an air waybill (AWB). Is this automatically wrong? Or merely risky?  A reader raised the issue bluntly — and rightly so. …

Read More

Who Is Responsible When an Original Bill of Lading Is Lost, Mislaid, or Destroyed?

By Mr Old Man
January 10, 2026
in :  Mr Old Man, Payment, Q&A
0
317

(This Q&A is excerpted from a discussion by the Trade Services Update editors (LCM_QUERY 2026-01) Intro In documentary credit practice, the loss of an original bill of lading after a complying presentation has been made often gives rise to confusion between payment obligations under a letter of credit and the practical arrangements required to obtain delivery of the goods. Parties …

Read More
1...141516...55Page 15 of 55

About me

Recent Posts

AI quản lý ai?

Mr Old Man
1 day ago

Mr. Old Man Tries Taco: Is TACO Better Than Bánh Mì or Bánh Xèo?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Can an LC Be Amended After Documents Have Been Presented?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Mr. Old Man thử món Taco: TACO này có ngon hơn bánh mì, bánh xèo không?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago
  • Popular
  • Recent
  • Comments
  • Tags

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

FIELD 72 (SENDER TO RECEIVER INFORMATION) OF MT 103

Mr Old Man
March 8, 2010

TRANSFERRING BANK S LIABILITY UNDER TRANSFERRED LC

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

AI quản lý ai?

Mr Old Man
1 day ago

Mr. Old Man Tries Taco: Is TACO Better Than Bánh Mì or Bánh Xèo?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Can an LC Be Amended After Documents Have Been Presented?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Mr. Old Man thử món Taco: TACO này có ngon hơn bánh mì, bánh xèo không?

Mr Old Man
2 days ago

Anonymous: Thank you for your reply. Yes, it was in the notify party details. It made me he...

Mr Old Man: I assume this email address appears in the notify party details. If the credit s...

Anonymous: Hi Mr. Old Man , What about the case where the email in the BL appears as "ABCST...

Rupnarayan Bose: I fully agree with this view. What the UCP says is the minimum obligation of the...

Facebook Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 Documents lost in transit Amendment negotiation Insurance fraud confirmation place-of-expiry On board notation Hope Hoffman DRAFTS Late presentation Insurance document invoice SBLC CPBL notify party Chợ Nồi Rang Messi endorsement Force Majeure Chat GPT lc-expired Mr Old Man

Follow Me

Popular posts

PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B)

Mr Old Man
October 19, 2015

UCP 600 ARTICLES 30 AND 31

Mr Old Man
March 16, 2010

WHETHER MT999 IS AN AUTHENTICATED SWIFT MESSAGE

Mr Old Man
July 31, 2018

TO ORDER BILL OF LADING AND ENDORSEMENT

Mr Old Man
March 6, 2010

Travel

EARLY PRESENTATION

Mr Old Man
September 11, 2017

QUESTION Dear Mr Old Man, I am Dang from Vietnam Prosperity bank. I know …

Timeline

  • March 5, 2010

    MIXED PAYMENT LC

  • 3 days ago

    Will Trump Avenue in Ottawa Become Taco Avenue!?

  • June 12, 2025

    Understanding ‘Full Set Less One’ & Discrepancy Fee Claims After Reimbursement

  • October 24, 2025

    When a Feeder Vessel Is an Ocean Vessel

  • June 1, 2026

    Tào lao chuyện viết lách

  • July 17, 2026

    Insurance Cover Exceeding the LC Requirement – Is ICC (A) Acceptable When the Credit Requires Marine Risks or ICC (C)?

Top Tags On board notation Amendment confirmation lc-expired Documents lost in transit Insurance Late presentation Insurance document Monkey Mountain Challenge 2025 DRAFTS Facebook Hope Hoffman negotiation fraud place-of-expiry
© Copyright 2014 - 2017 | Mr Old Man Theme by ThietKeWebDaNang.Com | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Cuongnq