SHIPPED ON BOARD THE VESSEL THAT LEAVES THE PORT OF LOADING QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, Good day. Please reiterate your explanation again regarding below query: Customer presented BL with place of receipt and port of loading as Bintulu Malaysia. With indication pre-carriage as UNI-Perfect and ocean vessel as EVER BRAVE. On board notation only shown as: Laden on board UNI-Perfect 7 May 2024 Bintulu. Is it a valid discrepancy, correct? … Read More
WHETHER THE ON BOARD NOTATION MUST ALWAYS INDICATE THE NAME OF THE VESSEL AND THE PORT OF LADING QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, The following LC clause: 44E: Any Australia port 44F: Laem Chabang/Bangkok port Thailand 44B: Bangkok, Thailand 46A: Full set ocean BL consigned to order blank endorsed, marked freight prepaid. If multimodal BL is presented, the on board notation needs to indicate the port of loading and name of the vessel. The BL presented indicates: Pre-carriage … Read More
ON BOARD NOTATION QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, Another disagreement that I have on a on board notation. LC 44E: Dalian, port to port BL requested. BL indicates: Pre carriage by: Vessel X Place of receipt: Dalian Ocean vessel: Vessel Y Port of loading: Dalian No other transshipment information available on BL What should the onboard notation indicate other than the date? My … Read More
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?
IS THE NOMINATED BANK REQUIRED TO VERIFY WHETHER THE BENEFICIARY HAS AUTHORIZED THE PRESENTING BANK TO PRESENT THE DOCUMENTS?
CAN THE ISUING BANK CITE “LATE PRESENTATION” AS A DISCREPANCY SOLELY BASED ON THE DATE OF THE COVER LETTER?