Mr Old Man PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B) QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, LC does not allow partial shipments. Documents were presented to the issuing bank in two separate covering schedules. The first set reached the issuing bank’s counter on 5 O… Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
HOWEVER NAMED 12 Jul 2018 HOWERVER NAMED QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, PLS answer my questions: I don’t understand the word “HOWEVER NAMED” in UCP 600, particularly Art 20 (a), which says “ A bill of lading, however named…..”. What does it mean? If on the face of the document, we determine and treat it as a bill of lading except the title ” Charter …
DOCUMENT CHECKING FEE 29 Jun 2018 QUESTION Good day, Mr. Old Man. We have an LC opened in our favour that allows partial shipments. Every time we present a drawing the confirming bank will find a discrepancy or two even though our bank (the advising Bank) would have assured us there were no discrepancies. The applicant ( buyer) always accepts the discrepancies (since sometimes the goods …
DEFERRED PAYMENT UNDERTAKING 20 Jun 2018 QUESTION I have come accross this statement. “Under UCP600, the DPU remains undefined and still a bit of a mystery as to whether/how its incurrence may/must be evidenced.” Could you please comment further? Best regards, G. —- ANSWER You may have learnt about Banco Santander case in connection with discounting one’s own deferred payment undertaking (DPU). The main details of …
DOES SHIPMENT FROM ANY CHINESE PORT INCLUDE TAIPEI PORT? 29 May 2018 QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, I’ve heard that if L/C stipulates the port of loading as “Any port in China” or “Any Chinese port”, a bill of lading indicating the port of loading as Hong Kong is acceptable. 1) Let me know if what I’ve heard is true. 2) If it is true, what if the bill of lading indicates …
WHICH ARTICLE OF UCP 600 IS APPLICABLE FOR EXAMINATION OF A TRANSPORT DOCUMENT 21 May 2018 QUESTION Hi Mr Old Man, Please help me with the following case: Field 44E : VietNam 44F : Belgium 44B : France 45A : CFR Belgium 46A : Bill Of Lading, …notify: applicant ( france) Cert of Origin and Health Cert must state final destination ( france ) B/l will state as follows Port of Loading : Vietnam Port of …
QUESTIONS REGARDING LC WITH T/T REIMBURSEMENT ALLOWED 19 May 2018 QUESTION Dear Mr. Nguyen, Many thanks for taking the time to reply while busy working . I apologize about unclear query on face book. Please allow me to explain more clearly: In fact we are the applicants our bank amended the L/C to allow T.T. Reimbursement without seeking our approval to authorize such amendment. The amendment was carried by issuing …
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two … Read More
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply … Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s … Read More
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho … Read More
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC … Read More
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. … Read More
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the … Read More
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that … Read More
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question … Read More
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as … Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two … Read More
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply … Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s … Read More
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho … Read More
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC … Read More
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. … Read More
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the … Read More
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that … Read More
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question … Read More
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as … Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? 12 Nov 2025 Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two …
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? 12 Nov 2025 When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply …
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities 12 Nov 2025 “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s …
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? 11 Nov 2025 Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho …
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 10 Nov 2025 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC …
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? 10 Nov 2025 Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. …
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? 10 Nov 2025 Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the …
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT 9 Nov 2025 Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that …
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) 7 Nov 2025 Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question …
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? 5 Nov 2025 INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as …
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities