Mr Old Man PARTIAL SHIPMENTS UNDER SUB-ARTICLE 31 (B) QUESTION Dear Mr. Old Man, LC does not allow partial shipments. Documents were presented to the issuing bank in two separate covering schedules. The first set reached the issuing bank’s counter on 5 O… Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
SUSPECTION OF FRAUD 28 Aug 2018 QUESTION L/C allows shipment from USA to India. In the B/L, both the place of receipt and port of loading indicate “New Jersey” and port of discharge and place of destination as name of Indian port. B/L only states a vessel name of xxxx. No indication that any transhipment has been made. No mention of any second vessel name in …
EXPERT OPINIONS ON A LETTER OF CREDIT FRAUD CASE 17 Aug 2018 FROM NGUYEN HUU DUC Dear members, As a frequent writer for banking magazines in Vietnam, I sometimes receive from local banks queries on international payment operations. Here below is one of the queries and my opinion that I wish to share with you and look forward to receiving your comments. At the request and for account of XYZ Company (Applicant) …
AUTHORIZATION/APPROVAL FOR NEGOTIATION/ PAYMENT OF DISCREPANT DOCUMENTS 16 Aug 2018 QUESTION Dear Sir, Sometimes the beneficiary presents the discrepant documents and requests my bank to negotiate the documents. In this case we would forward the documents to the issuing bank stating the discrepancies and ask for the issuing bank’s authorization or approval for us to negotiate the documents. Sometimes the issuing bank gives us its authorization to negotiate such documents. …
RECOURSE IN CASE THE DOCUMENTS ARE DISCREPANT OR FORGED 14 Aug 2018 by Nguyen Huu Duc A member of letterofcreditforum.com raised on the same forum a question regarding the right to recourse in case the documents honoured or negotiated are found to be discrepant or forged and rejected by the issuing bank or applicant. The question is not new. Still, it has remained to be one of the focuses of attention of …
CHỨNG TỪ BẢO HIỂM TRONG GIAO DỊCH LC 13 Aug 2018 Nguyễn Hữu Đức Trong thời gian qua, thông qua blog “For those who eat, sleep and breathe LC”, người viết bài này nhận được từ đồng nghiệp và bạn đọc quan tâm không ít những câu hỏi liên quan đến chứng từ bảo hiểm xuất trình theo LC. Điều này cho thấy hiểu hết các ngóc ngách của chứng từ …
NÀO CÙNG PHƯỢT XE ĐẠP HỒ HÒA TRUNG ĐI BẠN ƠI! 12 Aug 2018 Hồ Hòa Trung chỉ cách trung tâm thành phố Đà Nẵng về phía tây khoảng 22 -25 km tùy bạn chọn cung đường nào để đạp xe đến đó. Sáng nay thay vì đi theo cung Nguyễn Tất Thành qua Golden Hills lên thôn Tân Ninh để đến mặt đập hồ Hòa Trung, mình cùng với ba người bạn đi …
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two … Read More
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply … Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s … Read More
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho … Read More
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC … Read More
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. … Read More
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the … Read More
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that … Read More
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question … Read More
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as … Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two … Read More
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply … Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s … Read More
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho … Read More
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC … Read More
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. … Read More
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the … Read More
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that … Read More
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question … Read More
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as … Read More
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? 12 Nov 2025 Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation can change how banks interpret the document and who needs to endorse it. This week’s question from Xona Woo looks at two …
One Shipment by Sea, One by Air — How Should the Description of Goods Appear on the B/L? 12 Nov 2025 When part of an LC shipment goes by sea and another part goes by air, things can get a little tricky with document presentation. Should the Bill of Lading still reflect both items listed in the credit, or only the goods actually shipped by that mode of transport? Let’s look at what ISBP 821 says — and how to apply …
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities 12 Nov 2025 “By payment”, “by negotiation”, “by deferred payment”, “by acceptance” — same LC, different risks. But who really carries the burden when things go wrong?” A common question from trade finance practitioners — and one that sparks more debate than you’d expect. When an LC says “by payment” or “by negotiation”, who really bears the risk if things go sideways? Let’s …
AI làm trợ lý cho người – hay người làm trợ lý cho AI? 11 Nov 2025 Có bao giờ bạn nghĩ… người mới là trợ lý của AI chứ không phải ngược lại? Người ta vẫn hay nói: “Hãy dùng AI như một trợ lý của con người.” Nghe quen tai và hợp lý. Nhưng Mr. Old Man lại nghĩ, không phải lúc nào cũng đúng đâu nha. Có khi… con người làm trợ lý cho …
Full Means Full — Describing the Goods in Line with ISBP 821 10 Nov 2025 Intro Sometimes, the devil really is in the description. A letter of credit may ask for a “full description of goods,” and exporters wonder whether they can simplify the wording in their invoice — especially when only one mode of shipment applies. This question from Mr. Nishanth is a good example of how to balance what’s required by the LC …
Commitment Fee After LC Expiry — Still Chargeable? 10 Nov 2025 Intro: A reader recently asked an interesting question about fees under a letter of credit. When an LC expires, does that mean the applicant no longer has to pay commitment fees to the issuing bank? Let’s take a closer look. __________ Question: Good morning, Sir! Thank you so much for all your efforts in making trade finance information more accessible. …
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say? 10 Nov 2025 Sometimes a Bill of Lading can make bankers frown for all the wrong reasons. We’ve seen cases where it shows an “intended port of loading” and that’s fine under UCP 600, but what about when it shows an “intended port of discharge” instead? Does that make it discrepant? Let’s see what happens when Durban plays both roles — as the …
DOCUMENTS LOST IN TRANSIT 9 Nov 2025 Article 35 UCP 600 Does Not Apply to an L/C Available with the Issuing Bank by Payment, Deferred Payment, or Acceptance INTRODUCTION From time to time, LC practitioners raise concerns about what happens if documents are lost in transit between banks. Article 35 of UCP 600 seems to provide clear protection — but when and to whom does that …
When Is an Insurance Document Really ‘Negotiable’? – Understanding ISBP 821 (K19–K21) 7 Nov 2025 Insurance documents under a Letter of Credit can be tricky — especially when the LC calls for a document “in negotiable form” or “issued to the order of” a bank. What exactly does “negotiable form” mean? When is an endorsement required? And what happens if the LC doesn’t specify who the insured party should be? Below is a detailed question …
CAN A USANCE LC BE ISSUED AVAILABLE WITH ANY BANK? 5 Nov 2025 INTRO At first glance, it may sound reasonable to make a usance LC “available with any bank.” After all, the more flexibility for the beneficiary, the better—right? But in practice, things are rarely that simple. Under UCP 600, a nominated bank has no obligation to act unless it agrees to do so. That small detail makes all the difference, as …
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Mr Old Man Consignee in the Bill of Lading — How Far Can “On Behalf Of” Go? Intro: When it comes to the consignee field on a Bill of Lading under an export LC, wording matters — sometimes down to a single phrase like “on behalf of” or “for the account of.” A small variation c… Read More
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
When the Bill of Lading indicates “Intended Port of Discharge” and “Place of Delivery” — What does ISBP 821 E8(b) say?
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities
Who Bears the Risk? Understanding Issuing vs. Nominated Bank Responsibilities under Different LC Availabilities